60 exam-style questions on this अध्याय, written from the actual legal text and tagged for UPSC, Judiciary and CLAT. Five are shown below with answers and explanations — the rest are in the free interactive drill.
Q1 · easy · BNSS S.520
According to the provision's opening words, when an offence is tried by whom?
- A.High Court✓ सही
- B.Supreme Court
- C.Sessions Court
- D.Magistrate
क्यों: The provision begins: "When an offence is tried by the High Court...", so it clearly refers to occasions when the High Court tries an offence.
Read Section 520 — Trials before High Courts →Q2 · easy · BNSS S.520
What specific conduct does the provision instruct the court to follow in the proceedings?
- A.Refer the matter to a Sessions Judge
- B.Apply summary trial procedure
- C.Observe if it were trying the case✓ सही
- D.Stay proceedings pending review
क्यों: The provision directs the court to "observe if it were trying the case," which is the explicit instruction contained in the text.
Read Section 520 — Trials before High Courts →Q3 · medium · BNSS S.520
The phrase "otherwise than under" in the provision indicates the provision applies in which situation?
- A.Only when the trial is under a specific named provision
- B.When the offence is tried by the High Court not under (i.e. otherwise than under) some other provision✓ सही
- C.Only in appellate proceedings
- D.Only in summary proceedings before a Magistrate
क्यों: The text reads "When an offence is tried by the High Court otherwise than under...", indicating it applies where the High Court tries an offence not under the (unspecified) alternative provision—i.e. when tried otherwise than under it.
Read Section 520 — Trials before High Courts →Q4 · medium · BNSS S.520
When trying such an offence, in what manner is the High Court to conduct itself according to the text?
- A.As an appellate court reviewing lower court findings
- B.As a purely administrative body
- C.As a fact-finding magistrate
- D.By observing as if it were trying the case✓ सही
क्यों: The provision states the court should "observe if it were trying the case," meaning the court is to act in the manner of trying the case (i.e., observe as though it were trying it).
Read Section 520 — Trials before High Courts →Q5 · hard · BNSS S.520
Which of the following best captures the distinction the provision makes between actually trying an offence and the conduct it prescribes?
- A.It requires the High Court to transfer the trial to a Sessions Court.
- B.It mandates that the High Court must strictly follow appellate procedures.
- C.It requires the High Court to "observe if it were trying the case," i.e., to act as though trying the case rather than merely perform some other role.✓ सही
- D.It confines the High Court to only administrative oversight without judicial action.
क्यों: The provision's wording—"observe if it were trying the case"—indicates the court must act as though it is trying the case, distinguishing that conduct from other roles like mere administrative oversight.
Read Section 520 — Trials before High Courts →55 more questions on Miscellaneous
इन्हें इंटरैक्टिव रूप से ड्रिल करें — त्वरित प्रतिक्रिया, प्रत्येक प्रावधान के लिंक, और आपकी सटीकता सिलेबस मानचित्र पर ट्रैक की जाती है। मुफ्त।
मुफ्त ड्रिल शुरू करें →प्रश्न कानूनी पाठ से AI-जनित हैं, प्रावधान के विरुद्ध मशीन-प्रमाणित और संपादकीय रूप से समीक्षा योग्य हैं। शिक्षा हेतु, कानूनी सलाह नहीं।