Skip to content
सं Samvidhan
किंवा ऑनलाईन, वेळेअंतर्गत द्या →
संSamvidhan

सराव पेपर — BNS Chapter XVII — Of Offences Against Property

50 questions · answer key at the end · no time limit · 123 more on the site

ऑनलाइन सरावासाठी स्कॅन करा

samvidhan.co.in

  1. 1.Under Section 303(1) of the BNS, theft is committed when a person, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent, does what?

    • (A) Merely forms the intention to take it
    • (B) Moves that property in order to such taking
    • (C) Sells the property to a third party
    • (D) Retains the property for more than a day

  2. 2.A, having pawned his own watch to Z, takes it back out of Z's possession without Z's consent and without repaying the loan. Under Section 303 BNS, A has:

    • (A) Committed no offence, because the watch is his own property
    • (B) Committed theft, because he takes it dishonestly even though the watch is his own property
    • (C) Committed extortion
    • (D) Committed criminal misappropriation only

  3. 3.What is the punishment for snatching under Section 304(2) BNS?

    • (A) Imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both
    • (B) Imprisonment up to three years, and shall also be liable to fine
    • (C) Imprisonment up to seven years and fine
    • (D) Rigorous imprisonment up to ten years

  4. 4.What is the maximum punishment under Section 305 of the BNS for theft in a dwelling house or of government property?

    • (A) Three years' imprisonment
    • (B) Five years' imprisonment
    • (C) Seven years' imprisonment and fine
    • (D) Ten years' rigorous imprisonment

  5. 5.Under Section 305 BNS, theft of an idol attracts the aggravated punishment when it is committed:

    • (A) Anywhere, including a private collection
    • (B) In any place of worship
    • (C) Only in a temple managed by the Government
    • (D) Only if the idol is made of precious metal

  6. 6.What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by Section 306?

    • (A) Imprisonment up to three years
    • (B) Imprisonment up to five years
    • (C) Imprisonment up to seven years
    • (D) Imprisonment up to ten years

  7. 7.Under Section 307 (Theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, what is the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed?

    • (A) Seven years
    • (B) Ten years
    • (C) Life imprisonment
    • (D) Five years

  8. 8.Which of the following correctly states the essential elements of the offence of extortion under Section 308(1) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

    • (A) Intentionally putting any person in fear of injury and thereby dishonestly inducing that person to deliver any property, valuable security, or anything signed or sealed convertible into a valuable security.
    • (B) Causing any loss to a person by violence or theft, without the element of inducing delivery of property.
    • (C) Making a false promise to induce someone to part with property, even if no fear is put into the person.
    • (D) Receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen is extortion if the receiver threatens the owner later.

  9. 9.A threatens Z that he will send club-men to plough up Z’s field unless Z signs and delivers to B a bond, and Z signs and delivers the bond to B. Who is guilty of extortion under Section 308?

    • (A) Only B is guilty of extortion because B receives the bond.
    • (B) Neither A nor B is guilty unless A personally keeps the bond.
    • (C) Only Z is guilty for signing under fear.
    • (D) A is guilty of extortion although the bond is delivered to B.

  10. 10.What is the punishment for robbery under Section 309(4) BNS when it is committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise?

    • (A) Rigorous imprisonment which may extend to ten years
    • (B) Rigorous imprisonment which may extend to fourteen years
    • (C) Imprisonment for life in all cases
    • (D) Simple imprisonment up to seven years

  11. 11.Under Section 309(6) BNS, if one member of a group voluntarily causes hurt in committing robbery, what is the liability of the other persons jointly concerned in committing that robbery?

    • (A) They are liable only for simple robbery under Section 309(4)
    • (B) They are liable only if they personally caused hurt
    • (C) They too shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years, and fine
    • (D) They are liable only for abetment with half the punishment

  12. 12.If a person is one of five or more persons assembled for the purpose of committing dacoity (but before the dacoity is actually committed), the maximum punishment under Section 310 is:

    • (A) Life imprisonment
    • (B) Rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years
    • (C) Rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years
    • (D) No imprisonment, only fine

  13. 13.Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offence in IPC Section 391 (Dacoity) of the IPC now corresponds to which section?

    • (A) BNS Section 336 (Forgery)
    • (B) BNS Section 310 (Dacoity)
    • (C) BNS Section 238 (Causing disappearance of evidence of off)
    • (D) BNS Section 299 (Deliberate and malicious acts, intended)

  14. 14.An offender, while committing a dacoity, attempts to cause grievous hurt to a person but does not succeed. Does Section 311 prescribe the minimum imprisonment?

    • (A) No — only actual causing of grievous hurt triggers the section
    • (B) No — the section applies only when a deadly weapon is used
    • (C) Yes — an attempt to cause grievous hurt is explicitly included
    • (D) Yes — but only if the victim later dies

  15. 15.According to Section 312, when does the minimum seven-year imprisonment apply?

    • (A) When the offender is attempting to commit robbery or dacoity while armed with any deadly weapon.
    • (B) When the offender commits any theft, whether armed or unarmed.
    • (C) Only when the offender completes a dacoity while unarmed.
    • (D) When the offender is convicted of any violent offence, regardless of weapon.

  16. 16.If an offender successfully completes a robbery while armed with a deadly weapon, does Section 312 necessarily apply?

    • (A) Yes — it applies to all robberies committed while armed with a deadly weapon.
    • (B) Yes — but only if the offender is also convicted of dacoity.
    • (C) Yes — only when the weapon is discharged during the robbery.
    • (D) No — the provision expressly refers to attempting to commit robbery or dacoity, not completed offences.

  17. 17.Which of the following best describes the primary conduct criminalised by this provision?

    • (A) Belonging to a gang of persons associated in habitually committing theft or robbery
    • (B) Committing a single act of theft alone
    • (C) Belonging to a gang of dacoits
    • (D) Criminal misappropriation of property

  18. 18.Does Section 313 prescribe a minimum term of imprisonment for the offence it creates?

    • (A) Yes — a mandatory minimum of one year
    • (B) Yes — a mandatory minimum of seven years
    • (C) Yes — it prescribes both minimum and maximum terms
    • (D) No — it only states imprisonment may extend to seven years (i.e., provides a maximum) and liability to fine

  19. 19.A and B are joint owners of a horse. A takes the horse out of B's possession to ride it. Later A sells the horse and keeps all the sale proceeds for himself. Under Section 314, which is correct?

    • (A) A is not guilty because he had a right to use the horse
    • (B) A is guilty only of a civil wrong between co-owners
    • (C) A is guilty of the offence under Section 314 for appropriating the proceeds
    • (D) A is guilty of theft rather than misappropriation

  20. 20.Which of the following conduct is an offence under Section 315 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

    • (A) Dishonestly misappropriating property that was in the possession of a deceased person at the time of death and has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to such possession.
    • (B) Honest possession of property left by a deceased person.
    • (C) Misappropriation of property which has already come into the possession of a person legally entitled to it.
    • (D) Converting one’s own property to personal use.

  21. 21.Is the offender's knowledge that the property was in the possession of a deceased person at the time of that person's death a necessary element of the offence under Section 315?

    • (A) Yes, the provision requires the offender to know the property was in the deceased's possession at the time of death.
    • (B) No, knowledge of the property's status at death is irrelevant.
    • (C) Only if the property is money is such knowledge required.
    • (D) Only if the offender is a clerk or servant is such knowledge required.

  22. 22.What is the punishment for simple criminal breach of trust under Section 316(2) of the BNS?

    • (A) Imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both
    • (B) Imprisonment up to seven years and fine
    • (C) Imprisonment up to five years, or fine, or both
    • (D) Imprisonment for life only

  23. 23.Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offence in IPC Section 405 (Criminal breach of trust) of the IPC now corresponds to which section?

    • (A) BNS Section 115 (Voluntarily causing hurt)
    • (B) BNS Section 352 (Intentional insult with intent to provok)
    • (C) BNS Section 316 (Criminal breach of trust)
    • (D) BNS Section 62 (Punishment for attempting to commit offe)

  24. 24.If possession of property was transferred by theft outside India, is that property treated as 'stolen property' under Section 317(1)?

    • (A) No, only transfers within India are covered
    • (B) Yes, but only if later brought into India
    • (C) Yes, property remains designated as stolen whether the transfer was made within or without India
    • (D) Only if the theft is reported to Indian authorities

  25. 25.Under Section 318(1) of the BNS, the offence of cheating essentially requires:

    • (A) Deceiving a person and fraudulently or dishonestly inducing him to deliver property, or intentionally inducing him to do or omit something causing or likely to cause damage or harm
    • (B) Merely making a false statement to another person
    • (C) Entrustment of property followed by its misappropriation
    • (D) Taking movable property out of another's possession without consent

  26. 26.Under Section 318(3) of the BNS, an enhanced punishment of up to five years applies where the cheater:

    • (A) Cheats by using a forged document
    • (B) Cheats a public servant during official duty
    • (C) Knows he is likely to cause wrongful loss to a person whose interest in the transaction he was bound, by law or legal contract, to protect
    • (D) Cheats and induces delivery of property worth over one lakh rupees

  27. 27.Under Section 319(1) of the BNS, a person is said to cheat by personation if he cheats by:

    • (A) Making a false document in another's name
    • (B) Pretending to be some other person, or knowingly substituting one person for another, or representing that he or another is a person other than he really is
    • (C) Threatening another person with injury to reputation
    • (D) Concealing material facts in a transaction

  28. 28.Which of the following correctly distinguishes cheating by personation under Section 319 BNS from simple cheating under Section 318 BNS?

    • (A) Section 319 requires that the person personated must actually exist, unlike Section 318
    • (B) Section 319 carries a lower maximum punishment than simple cheating
    • (C) Section 319 does not require any deception at all
    • (D) Cheating by personation is a species of cheating where the deception consists in pretending to be another person, and it carries up to five years' imprisonment against three years for simple cheating

  29. 29.What punishment does Section 320 prescribe for the offence?

    • (A) Imprisonment of either description for a term not less than three months
    • (B) Only a fine
    • (C) Imprisonment of either description for a term not less than six months but which may extend to two years, or fine, or both
    • (D) Imprisonment for a fixed term of two years without a fine option

  30. 30.Which mental state does Section 321 require for the offence?

    • (A) Dishonestly or fraudulently
    • (B) Negligence
    • (C) Recklessness
    • (D) Strict liability (no mental element)

  31. 31.Does mere negligence in preventing a debt or demand from being made available attract liability under Section 321?

    • (A) Yes, negligence is sufficient
    • (B) Only if there is also dishonesty
    • (C) No, it must be dishonest or fraudulent
    • (D) Only if financial loss exceeds a statutory threshold

  32. 32.If a person innocently (without dishonesty or fraud) signs a deed that contains a false statement relating to the consideration, is that person punishable under Section 322?

    • (A) Yes — mere presence of a false statement is enough.
    • (B) No — the provision requires the act to be done dishonestly or fraudulently.
    • (C) Yes — but only if the false statement causes financial loss to another.
    • (D) Yes — but only if the deed is registered.

  33. 33.Which of the following acts is explicitly criminalised by Section 323 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

    • (A) Honest removal of one’s own property
    • (B) Dishonestly or fraudulently concealing or removing any property of himself or any other person
    • (C) Dishonestly releasing a demand to which he is not entitled
    • (D) Civil breach of trust regarding property

  34. 34.Which statement correctly reflects the provision's language about releasing a demand or claim?

    • (A) Only a dishonest release of a demand or claim to which he is entitled is punishable
    • (B) Only release of demands to which he is not entitled is punishable
    • (C) Any release of a demand or claim is punishable whether honest or dishonest
    • (D) Releasing a demand or claim is not mentioned in the provision

  35. 35.If mischief is committed and thereby causes damage to property belonging to a Government or Local Authority, what is the maximum term of imprisonment provided by the provision?

    • (A) Imprisonment which may extend to six months
    • (B) Imprisonment which may extend to one year
    • (C) Imprisonment which may extend to two years
    • (D) Imprisonment which may extend to five years

  36. 36.Under Section 325 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which of the following acts is expressly criminalised as 'mischief'?

    • (A) Killing, poisoning, maiming or rendering useless any animal
    • (B) Only killing an animal
    • (C) Causing damage to inanimate property
    • (D) Stealing an animal

  37. 37.Regarding penalties under Section 325, which statement correctly reflects the sentencing options available to a court?

    • (A) The court may impose imprisonment only
    • (B) The court may impose a fine only
    • (C) The court may impose imprisonment, or a fine, or both
    • (D) The court is limited to imposing community service

  38. 38.A person intentionally sets fire to standing crops, intending to cause damage to agricultural produce. Which clause applies and what is the maximum punishment under Section 326?

    • (A) Clause (f): imprisonment which may extend to five years
    • (B) Clause (f): imprisonment which may extend to seven years and also liable to fine
    • (C) Clause (g): imprisonment for life only
    • (D) Clause (e): imprisonment which may extend to one year

  39. 39.Section 327 applies to mischief committed to which of the following?

    • (A) Only aircraft and rails
    • (B) Any rail, aircraft, a decked vessel, or any vessel of a burden of twenty tons or upwards
    • (C) All watercraft regardless of burden
    • (D) Motor vehicles, aircraft and pipelines

  40. 40.Does subsection (2) of Section 327 cover an attempt (not only a completed act) to commit the mischief by fire or any explosive substance?

    • (A) No — only completed acts are covered
    • (B) Yes — attempt is covered but attracts lesser punishment than completion
    • (C) Only if the attempt causes actual damage
    • (D) Yes — it expressly covers commit or attempts to commit by fire or any explosive substance and prescribes the punishment

  41. 41.If a person intentionally runs a vessel aground intending that theft may be committed but no theft actually occurs, is Section 328 applicable?

    • (A) No — the actual commission of theft is required for Section 328 to apply
    • (B) Yes — but only if an attempt to steal was also made
    • (C) Yes — intent that such theft or misappropriation may be committed is sufficient under the provision
    • (D) Yes — but only when a fine is imposed

  42. 42.Which of the following correctly states the elements of 'criminal trespass' under Section 329(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

    • (A) Entering into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy, or having lawfully entered, unlawfully remaining there with such intent.
    • (B) Entering any land or property, whether in another’s possession or not, regardless of intent.
    • (C) Only entering property with intent to steal is criminal trespass.
    • (D) Remaining on property without permission is criminal trespass even if there is no intent to intimidate or commit an offence.

  43. 43.If a person enters a deserted cottage (not in the possession of another) used as a human dwelling with intent to commit an offence, is that an offence under Section 329?

    • (A) No — Section 329(1) requires the property to be in the possession of another for criminal trespass to arise.
    • (B) Yes — any entry into a building used as a human dwelling with intent to commit an offence is house-trespass regardless of possession.
    • (C) Yes — intent to commit an offence alone suffices for criminal trespass even without possession by another.
    • (D) No — entry into buildings used as dwellings is never an offence under Section 329.

  44. 44.Which of the following examples, as given in the provision, is explicitly described as house-breaking?

    • (A) Entering through an unlocked front door left open by the occupier
    • (B) Entering a house through a window
    • (C) Entering a house where no locks are present and using a ladder to climb in
    • (D) Passing through an open gate into the compound without entering the house

  45. 45.Under Section 331(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, what is the maximum punishment for committing lurking house-trespass or house-breaking (without any other special circumstance)?

    • (A) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and fine
    • (B) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and fine
    • (C) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and fine
    • (D) Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and fine

  46. 46.Under Section 331(4), what is the maximum punishment where lurking house-trespass or house-breaking is committed after sunset and before sunrise with the intention of committing theft?

    • (A) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years
    • (B) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years
    • (C) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years
    • (D) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to fourteen years

  47. 47.Where the offence intended to be committed is punishable with imprisonment for life, what is the maximum term of imprisonment for the house-trespass under Section 332?

    • (A) Two years
    • (B) Imprisonment for life
    • (C) Ten years
    • (D) Fine only

  48. 48.Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offence in IPC Section 449 (House-trespass in order to commit offenc) of the IPC now corresponds to which section?

    • (A) BNS Section 106 (Causing death by negligence)
    • (B) BNS Section 340 (Forged document or electronic record and)
    • (C) BNS Section 356 (Defamation)
    • (D) BNS Section 332 (House-trespass in order to commit offenc)

  49. 49.If a person commits house-trespass after preparing to assault someone but no assault or hurt actually occurs, is Section 333 attracted?

    • (A) No — an actual assault or hurt must occur for Section 333 to apply.
    • (B) Only if the trespass caused the person to be put in fear.
    • (C) Yes — the section applies where there is house-trespass coupled with preparation for assault even if no assault or hurt takes place.
    • (D) Only if the preparation included an attempt to carry out the assault during the trespass.

  50. 50.What is the maximum punishment specified in Section 334(1)?

    • (A) Imprisonment which may extend to five years, or fine, or both.
    • (B) Imprisonment which may extend to one year, or fine, or both.
    • (C) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
    • (D) Only fine; no imprisonment is provided.

उत्तर की

1. B2. B3. B4. C5. B6. C7. B8. A9. D10. B11. C12. C13. B14. C15. A16. D17. A18. D19. C20. A21. A22. C23. C24. C25. A26. C27. B28. D29. C30. A31. C32. B33. B34. A35. B36. A37. C38. B39. B40. D41. C42. A43. A44. B45. A46. D47. C48. D49. C50. C

स्पष्टीकरणे

  1. 1. (B) Section 303(1) defines theft as moving the property 'in order to such taking' with dishonest intention, without the possessor's consent. The offence is complete upon the moving of the property; asportation beyond that point is not required.
  2. 2. (B) Illustration (k) to Section 303 states that A commits theft in taking his pawned watch from Z without consent and without paying the debt, 'though the watch is his own property,' because the taking is dishonest. Ownership is no defence where the property is lawfully in another's possession.
  3. 3. (B) Section 304(2) prescribes imprisonment of either description up to three years 'and shall also be liable to fine.' Unlike ordinary theft under Section 303(2), the fine here is in addition to imprisonment rather than an alternative.
  4. 4. (C) Section 305 BNS prescribes imprisonment of either description up to seven years, and the offender shall also be liable to fine. This is an aggravated form of theft compared with the three-year maximum for simple theft under Section 303(2).
  5. 5. (B) Clause (d) of Section 305 covers theft 'of idol or icon in any place of worship.' The location — a place of worship — is the qualifying element; the section does not distinguish by the idol's material or the management of the place.
  6. 6. (C) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years," so the maximum term specified is seven years. The section therefore does not provide for terms of three, five or ten years.
  7. 7. (B) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine." Therefore the maximum term specified is ten years.
  8. 8. (A) Section 308(1) defines extortion as intentionally putting a person in fear of injury and thereby dishonestly inducing that person to deliver property or a valuable security or anything signed/sealed which may be converted into a valuable security. The other options describe different facts not matching the statutory elements.
  9. 9. (D) Illustration (c) to Section 308(1) states that A threatens Z to induce Z to sign and deliver a bond to B, and thereby induces Z; A has committed extortion. The fact that delivery is to B does not prevent A’s liability.
  10. 10. (B) Section 309(4) punishes robbery with rigorous imprisonment up to ten years and fine, but if the robbery is committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.
  11. 11. (C) Section 309(6) provides that if any person voluntarily causes hurt in committing or attempting robbery, 'such person, and any other person jointly concerned' shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years plus fine. Joint participants thus share the aggravated liability even without personally causing the hurt.
  12. 12. (C) Section 310(5) states that whoever is one of five or more persons assembled for the purpose of committing dacoity shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
  13. 13. (B) IPC Section 391 (Dacoity) maps to BNS Section 310 (Dacoity) in the BNS.
  14. 14. (C) The provision expressly includes "attempts to cause death or grievous hurt to any person" as a trigger. Therefore an attempt to cause grievous hurt, even if unsuccessful, brings the minimum imprisonment provision into play.
  15. 15. (A) Section 312 states that if, at the time of attempting to commit robbery or dacoity, the offender is armed with any deadly weapon, the imprisonment shall not be less than seven years. Thus the provision specifically applies to attempts to commit robbery or dacoity while armed with a deadly weapon.
  16. 16. (D) Section 312 specifically refers to the situation 'at the time of attempting to commit robbery or dacoity' and prescribes the minimum imprisonment in that circumstance. The text does not state that it applies to completed offences, so from the provision alone it applies to attempts.
  17. 17. (A) The provision penalises "Whoever belongs to any gang of persons associated in habitually committing theft or robbery," so the core element is membership of such a gang. It expressly excludes a gang of dacoits and the text does not define single acts or misappropriation as this offence.
  18. 18. (D) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years," which indicates a permissible maximum but does not specify any minimum term. It also adds that the offender "shall also be liable to fine."
  19. 19. (C) The illustration explains that while taking the horse to use is not dishonest misappropriation (A had a right to use it), if A sells the horse and appropriates the whole proceeds to his own use, he is guilty of the offence under this section.
  20. 20. (A) Section 315 criminalises whoever dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use any property, knowing it was in the possession of a deceased person at the time of that person's decease, and has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to such possession. The other options do not satisfy these statutory requirements.
  21. 21. (A) The offence is defined as occurring when one "dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use any property, knowing that such property was in the possession of a deceased person at the time of that person's decease..." Thus the statute expressly requires that knowledge.
  22. 22. (C) Section 316(2) BNS prescribes imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or fine, or both for criminal breach of trust simpliciter. The higher punishments in sub-sections (3) to (5) apply only to specified categories of offenders.
  23. 23. (C) IPC Section 405 (Criminal breach of trust) maps to BNS Section 316 (Criminal breach of trust) in the BNS.
  24. 24. (C) Section 317(1) states that such property is designated as stolen property whether the transfer has been made within or without India. There is no requirement in the provision that it be brought into India or reported for the designation to apply.
  25. 25. (A) Section 318(1) BNS defines cheating as deceiving any person and thereby fraudulently or dishonestly inducing delivery of property or consent to its retention, or intentionally inducing an act or omission that causes or is likely to cause damage or harm in body, mind, reputation or property. Entrustment followed by misappropriation is criminal breach of trust, not cheating.
  26. 26. (C) Section 318(3) BNS applies where the offender cheats with knowledge that he is likely to cause wrongful loss to a person whose interest in the transaction he was bound, either by law or by a legal contract, to protect, and prescribes imprisonment up to five years, or fine, or both. There is no monetary threshold in the provision.
  27. 27. (B) Section 319(1) BNS defines cheating by personation as cheating by pretending to be some other person, by knowingly substituting one person for another, or by representing that he or any other person is a person other than he or such other person really is. Making a false document is forgery, a distinct offence.
  28. 28. (D) Section 319(1) BNS begins with 'if he cheats by pretending...', making personation an aggravated form of cheating in which the deception is as to identity. Its punishment under Section 319(2) extends to five years, compared with three years for simple cheating under Section 318(2), and the Explanation clarifies the personated individual may even be imaginary.
  29. 29. (C) Section 320 specifies punishment of imprisonment of either description for a term not less than six months but which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. The provision gives a minimum and a possible maximum term and permits fine or both.
  30. 30. (A) The section begins with "Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently prevents...", so the offence requires a dishonest or fraudulent mental state. Negligence, recklessness or strict liability are not mentioned in the provision.
  31. 31. (C) The section expressly requires that the act be done "dishonestly or fraudulently". Therefore mere negligence (or a threshold loss rule not mentioned in the text) is not sufficient under this provision.
  32. 32. (B) Section 322 applies to "Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently signs, executes or becomes a party to" such a deed. The mental element of dishonesty or fraud is therefore required in addition to the false statement about consideration.
  33. 33. (B) The provision states: 'Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently conceals or removes any property of himself or any other person... shall be punished...' Thus dishonest or fraudulent concealment or removal is criminalised. The text does not penalise honest removal or label mere civil breaches as this offence.
  34. 34. (A) The provision specifically criminalises one who 'dishonestly releases any demand or claim to which he is entitled'. Thus the text requires both that the person be entitled to the claim and that the release be dishonest to constitute the offence. Releases not described as dishonest are not covered by this clause in the provision.
  35. 35. (B) Section 324(3) provides that whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to any property including the property of Government or Local Authority shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year.
  36. 36. (A) The provision states: "Whoever commits mischief by killing, poisoning, maiming or rendering useless any animal shall be punished..." It therefore expressly criminalises all four listed acts against any animal.
  37. 37. (C) Section 325 provides punishment "with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both." Thus the court may impose imprisonment, or fine, or both together.
  38. 38. (B) Clause (f) covers use of fire or explosive substance intending to cause damage to property including agricultural produce and prescribes imprisonment which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
  39. 39. (B) The provision expressly lists "any rail, aircraft, or a decked vessel or any vessel of a burden of twenty tons or upwards" as the subjects of the offence. Therefore the correct formulation is the full list given in the section.
  40. 40. (D) Subsection (2) explicitly says "Whoever commits, or attempts to commit, by fire or any explosive substance, such mischief as is described in sub-section (1)" and then prescribes the punishment. Therefore attempts by those means are covered with the prescribed penalties.
  41. 41. (C) Section 328 criminalises intentionally running a vessel aground with intent that theft or misappropriation may be committed; the provision therefore punishes the specified intent even if the theft does not actually occur.
  42. 42. (A) Section 329(1) defines criminal trespass as entering property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy, or lawfully entering and then unlawfully remaining there with such intent. The provision requires both the possession-of-another element and the specified intents.
  43. 43. (A) Section 329(1) defines criminal trespass in relation to property 'in the possession of another.' Subsection (2) treats certain entries as house-trespass only when they constitute criminal trespass. Therefore, where the property is not in another’s possession, Section 329 does not apply.
  44. 44. (B) Illustration (c) to Section 330 states that committing house-trespass by entering Z’s house through a window is house-breaking. The provision specifically treats entry through a window as house-breaking; the other options are not the illustrations given.
  45. 45. (A) Section 331(1) states that whoever commits lurking house-trespass or house-breaking shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine. This is the basic penalty absent other specified circumstances.
  46. 46. (D) Section 331(4) provides that if lurking house-trespass or house-breaking after sunset and before sunrise is committed in order to the committing of any offence punishable with imprisonment, the term may extend to five years; and if the offence intended is theft, the term may be extended to fourteen years.
  47. 47. (C) Clause (b) provides that if the intended offence is punishable with imprisonment for life, the house-trespasser shall be punished "with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding ten years, and shall also be liable to fine." Therefore the maximum term is ten years.
  48. 48. (D) IPC Section 449 (House-trespass in order to commit offenc) maps to BNS Section 332 (House-trespass in order to commit offenc) in the BNS.
  49. 49. (C) Section 333 criminalises "house-trespass, having made preparation for causing hurt ... or for assault ..."; it requires the preparatory intention plus trespass, not the occurrence of actual hurt or assault. Thus absence of actual assault does not preclude application of the section.
  50. 50. (C) Section 334(1) prescribes punishment by imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. The provision thus allows imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both.

प्रश्न कायदा मजकुरातून तयार केले जातात आणि स्वतंत्ररीत्या पडताळले जातात. प्रिंट, फोटोकॉपी आणि वाटप करण्यास मोफत, कोचिंग सेंटरसहित — कृपया क्रेडिट ठेवावे. पूर्ण मजकूर, स्पष्टीकरणे आणि 10,000+ प्रश्न samvidhan.co.in वर.