सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 190

Vacation of seats

Why this exists

The framers wanted to ensure that each elected member represents one constituency in one House at a time, preventing overlapping mandates and confusion about representation. They also wanted mechanisms to remove members who become disqualified, voluntarily resign, or abandon their duties through prolonged unexplained absence, ensuring the Legislature functions with genuinely committed and eligible members. The safeguard on resignations (checking they are voluntary) was added to prevent coerced or fraudulent resignations, a concern that grew more prominent after real-world instances of political pressure on legislators.

How courts read it

Courts have generally deferred to the Speaker's or Chairman's satisfaction on whether a resignation is voluntary and genuine, though judicial review remains available if the decision is shown to be arbitrary or mala fide. Cases involving resignations amid political defections (especially before and after the Anti-Defection Law was added via the Tenth Schedule in 1985) have tested how Speakers assess 'voluntariness', with courts emphasizing that the Speaker must conduct a fair inquiry rather than accept resignations mechanically.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: A resignation from a legislator is always accepted automatically.
    Fact: The Speaker or Chairman must first check whether the resignation is voluntary and genuine before accepting it, and can refuse it if there's coercion or fraud.
  • Myth: Missing a few sessions can immediately cost a legislator their seat.
    Fact: The seat can only be declared vacant after 60 days of unexplained absence from all meetings, and time when the House is prorogued or adjourned for over four days doesn't count.
  • Myth: A person can hold seats in two states' legislatures if elected to both.
    Fact: Clause (2) prohibits this; the person must resign from all but one within a time fixed by presidential rules, or lose all such seats automatically.