सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 189

Voting in Houses, power of Houses to act notwithstanding vacancies and quorum

Why this exists

State legislatures needed clear, practical rules to avoid deadlock or chaos — deciding what counts as a valid vote, how to handle empty seats, and what happens if too few members are present. These rules, borrowed from British parliamentary practice and mirrored in Article 100 for Parliament, ensure that a State House can keep working even when it isn't at full strength, while still requiring a minimum presence (quorum) for legitimacy.

How courts read it

Courts have generally treated matters like quorum and internal voting procedure as part of the House's internal proceedings, largely protected from judicial interference under provisions like Article 212 (courts not inquiring into legislative proceedings). No major Supreme Court judgment has significantly reinterpreted Article 189 itself; it is mostly applied through legislative rules and Speaker's rulings.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The Speaker or Chairman gets to vote on every issue like other members.
    Fact: The Speaker/Chairman doesn't vote in the first round; they only cast a vote to break a tie.
  • Myth: If some seats in the House are vacant, the House can't function or pass valid laws.
    Fact: Article 189(2) specifically allows the House to act despite vacancies, and decisions remain valid.
  • Myth: Quorum in every State Assembly is fixed permanently at 10 members.
    Fact: Article 189(3) sets a default (10 members or one-tenth, whichever is greater) only until the State Legislature passes its own law changing it.