सं Samvidhan

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 75

repealed

Enhanced punishment for certain offences under Chapter XII or Chapter XVII after previous conviction

Why this exists

Colonial-era lawmakers included this provision to deter repeat, habitual offenders in property crimes and coin/stamp forgery. The idea was that a person who reoffends after already being punished for a serious crime shows a pattern of criminal conduct, and deserves a stricter penalty than a first-time offender to protect public trust in property rights and currency/stamp systems.

How courts read it

Courts have held that Section 75 is only a sentencing-enhancement provision, not a separate offence in itself; it must be read along with the specific section defining the current offence (like theft or cheating). Courts have also clarified that the earlier conviction must be proved by producing the judgment or a certified copy, and both the earlier and the current offence must independently meet the three-year-or-more imprisonment threshold for this enhanced punishment to apply.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Section 75 creates a brand new crime called 'repeat offence.'
    Fact: Courts have clarified that Section 75 does not define a new offence; it only allows enhanced punishment for someone convicted again under Chapter XII or XVII after already being convicted once before under those chapters.
  • Myth: Any past conviction, no matter how minor, triggers this enhanced punishment.
    Fact: The provision applies only if both the earlier and the current offence are punishable with imprisonment of 3 years or more under Chapter XII or XVII specifically.