सं Samvidhan

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 73

repealed

Solitary confinement

Why this exists

Section 73 comes from the original 1860 Indian Penal Code, drafted under British colonial rule when solitary confinement was seen in English and European penology as both a punishment and a supposed tool for reform through isolation. Lawmakers worried that judges might overuse this harsh measure, so they built in a sliding scale of maximum periods (one, two, or three months) tied to the length of the sentence, ensuring solitary confinement stayed a limited add-on rather than the main punishment.

How courts read it

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1978), the Supreme Court examined solitary confinement and prison isolation practices, holding that such measures must be applied sparingly, with due process, and cannot be used in a manner that amounts to cruel or inhuman treatment violating Article 21 of the Constitution. Courts have since treated Section 73 as an exceptional power, to be invoked only with clear judicial reasoning and never as a routine part of sentencing.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Courts can order solitary confinement for as long as they want.
    Fact: The law fixes strict maximum limits — one, two, or three months — depending on the total length of the sentence, and courts must justify using it at all.
  • Myth: Solitary confinement under Section 73 can be applied to any prison sentence.
    Fact: It only applies where the offence carries the possibility of rigorous imprisonment, not to simple imprisonment sentences.