सं Samvidhan

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 411

repealed

Dishonestly receiving stolen property

Why this exists

This section discourages the market for stolen goods by punishing not just thieves but also those who knowingly buy or hold onto stolen property. Without such a provision, thieves would find it easy to profit from stolen goods through willing buyers, so the law targets the demand side of theft-related crime as well. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, this corresponds to Section 317(2).

How courts read it

Courts have consistently held that mere possession of stolen property is not enough; the prosecution must prove that the accused either knew the property was stolen or had reason to believe so, based on surrounding circumstances such as an unusually low price, suspicious circumstances of the sale, or the seller's demeanor.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: You are only guilty if you personally stole the item.
    Fact: You can be guilty under this section simply for receiving or keeping stolen property while knowing or suspecting it was stolen, even if someone else stole it.