सं Samvidhan

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 153A

repealed

Promoting enmity between different groups on ground of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony

Why this exists

Section 153A was introduced during the colonial period and later strengthened after Independence and Partition, when communal violence and hate speech had caused deep social divisions and bloodshed. Lawmakers wanted a tool to prevent speech and actions that could ignite communal riots or organized violence between religious, caste, or linguistic groups, especially given India's diversity and history of communal tension.

How courts read it

Courts, including the Supreme Court, have held that mere criticism or academic discussion of religion or communities does not attract this section — there must be a deliberate intention or clear likelihood of promoting enmity or disturbing public order. Courts have emphasized reading the words or acts in context, looking at their probable effect on public tranquility rather than just their literal content. Judgments have also clarified that the provision protects free speech from being weaponized, while still checking incitement to hatred.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Any criticism of a religion or community is punishable under Section 153A.
    Fact: Courts have clarified that genuine criticism, academic discussion, or artistic expression isn't covered — the law targets deliberate attempts to incite hatred or violence between groups.
  • Myth: Section 153A only applies to speeches or writings.
    Fact: It also covers organizing or participating in drills, movements, or activities meant to train people for violence against a religious or social group.