संSamvidhan
Practice paper — IPC Chapter 22 — Criminal Intimidation, Insult And Annoyance
39 questions · answer key at the end · no time limit
samvidhan.co.in
1.Which of the following is an essential element of 'criminal intimidation' under Section 503, IPC?
- (A) Actual injury must have been inflicted on the person threatened.
- (B) A threat of injury to person, reputation or property with intent to cause alarm or to compel an act/omission.
- (C) Only threats to property constitute criminal intimidation.
- (D) The threat must be given in writing to amount to criminal intimidation.
2.Does Section 503 cover a threat against the reputation of a person in whom the threatened person is interested?
- (A) Yes, threats to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested are included.
- (B) No, only the threatened person's own reputation is protected.
- (C) Only if the person in whom he is interested is a relative.
- (D) Only if property of that interested person is also threatened.
3.A threatens B intending to cause alarm to C (a third person), but B himself is not intended to be alarmed. Does this fall within Section 503?
- (A) Yes — causing alarm to any person is sufficient.
- (B) Yes — if C is related to B.
- (C) No — the provision requires intent "to cause alarm to that person" (the person threatened).
- (D) Only if B later suffers actual injury.
4.A threatens to damage the property of B (a third person) in order to coerce C, who is interested in B. Does Section 503 criminalise this threat?
- (A) Yes — any threat to property amounts to criminal intimidation under Section 503.
- (B) No — Section 503 only extends to the person or reputation of any one in whom the threatened person is interested, not that person's property.
- (C) Yes — but only if C stands to lose a legal right over B's property.
- (D) No — property threats are never covered by Section 503.
5.Which mental state is required under Section 504 of the IPC for the offender regarding the likelihood that the provocation will cause a breach of the public peace or another offence?
- (A) Only the intention to insult the person
- (B) Intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace or to commit any other offence
- (C) Only knowledge that the insult will offend the person
- (D) No specific mental state is required
6.What is the maximum statutory imprisonment term provided by Section 504 of the IPC?
- (A) Six months
- (B) One year
- (C) Two years
- (D) Five years
7.Is it necessary, under Section 504, that the provoked person actually breaks the public peace or commits another offence for the offender to be liable?
- (A) No — liability depends on the offender's intention or knowledge that the provocation was likely to cause such breach or offence, not on the actual commission
- (B) Yes — actual breach or commission of an offence is a necessary element
- (C) Yes — only if a fine is imposed
- (D) Only if both breach and another offence occur
8.Which combination of elements must be present to constitute the offence under Section 504?
- (A) Only the act of insulting, regardless of provocation
- (B) Only provocation, even if the insult was unintentional
- (C) Either insult or provocation alone is sufficient
- (D) An intentional insult that thereby gives provocation coupled with the offender's intention or knowledge that such provocation is likely to cause a breach of the peace or another offence
9.If a person intentionally insults another and provokes them, but the insulter only becomes aware after the fact that the provocation was likely to cause a breach, is the insulter liable under Section 504?
- (A) Yes — provocation having occurred makes the insulter automatically liable
- (B) No — Section 504 requires that the insulter be 'intending or knowing' it to be likely at the time of the act
- (C) Yes — liability arises only if the provoked person actually committed an offence
- (D) No — liability requires the provoked person to both break the peace and commit another offence
10.What is the maximum term of imprisonment provided by this section for the specified offence committed in a place of worship or an assembly engaged in worship?
- (A) Imprisonment which may extend to three years
- (B) Imprisonment which may extend to five years
- (C) Imprisonment which may extend to seven years
- (D) Life imprisonment
11.Does the section also make the offender liable to a fine in addition to imprisonment?
- (A) Yes — the offender shall also be liable to fine.
- (B) No — only imprisonment is provided.
- (C) No — only a fine is provided.
- (D) No penal provision is stated in this section.
12.If an offence specified in sub-section (2) is committed inside a place of worship when no religious service is taking place, is the offender covered by this section?
- (A) No — it applies only when religious worship is being performed there.
- (B) Only if an assembly is present and engaged in worship.
- (C) Yes — it applies to any place of worship regardless of whether worship is in progress.
- (D) Only if sub-section (2) expressly mentions the timing of worship.
13.Does this section apply to an assembly that is present but not engaged in religious worship or ceremonies?
- (A) Yes — any assembly is covered under this section.
- (B) Yes — but only if the assembly is in a place of worship.
- (C) Yes — if the assembly intends to hold worship later.
- (D) No — it applies to an assembly only when engaged in the performance of religious worship or ceremonies.
14.Which of the following best describes the punishments prescribed by this section?
- (A) Only a fine is prescribed for the offence.
- (B) Only imprisonment, which may extend to five years, is prescribed.
- (C) Both imprisonment (which may extend to five years) and a fine are prescribed.
- (D) Either imprisonment up to five years or a fine, but not both, is prescribed.
15.Under Section 506 IPC, what is the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for criminal intimidation?
- (A) Imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years
- (B) Imprisonment for a term of three years
- (C) Life imprisonment
- (D) Imprisonment for six months
16.Which of the following punishments does Section 506 IPC expressly allow for the offence of criminal intimidation?
- (A) Imprisonment only
- (B) Death penalty
- (C) Imprisonment, or fine, or both
- (D) Community service only
17.Does Section 506 IPC permit "imprisonment of either description" as a mode of punishment?
- (A) No — it does not mention the description of imprisonment
- (B) Yes — it permits "imprisonment of either description"
- (C) No — it permits only one type of imprisonment
- (D) It permits only a fine, not imprisonment
18.Can a court impose both imprisonment and a fine together under Section 506 IPC?
- (A) No — the court must choose either imprisonment or fine
- (B) Only if imprisonment exceeds one year
- (C) Only a fine may be imposed
- (D) Yes — the court may impose imprisonment, or fine, or both
19.The phrase "for a term which may extend to two years" in Section 506 IPC means:
- (A) Two years is the maximum possible term; lesser terms may be imposed
- (B) Two years is a mandatory minimum sentence
- (C) Every conviction must result in exactly two years' imprisonment
- (D) There is no upper limit on imprisonment under this section
20.According to Section 507 of the Indian Penal Code, what conduct is specifically criminalised?
- (A) Only making threats by an anonymous communication
- (B) Either making criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication or taking precautions to conceal the name or abode of the person from whom the threat comes
- (C) Both an anonymous communication and concealment of name/abode must be present together
- (D) Only taking precautions to conceal identity when no threat is made
21.What is the maximum term of imprisonment provided by Section 507 for the offence described?
- (A) Three years
- (B) One year
- (C) Six months
- (D) Two years
22.If a person sends a threatening letter but deliberately gives a false return address to hide who sent it, does Section 507 apply according to its wording?
- (A) Yes; taking precaution to conceal the name or abode of the person from whom the threat comes attracts Section 507
- (B) No; Section 507 applies only to threats made verbally
- (C) Only if the threat was also delivered anonymously without any address information
- (D) Only if the false address is outside the country
23.Does Section 507 impose its punishment in place of, or in addition to, the punishment provided for the offence by the last preceding section?
- (A) It replaces the punishment provided by the last preceding section
- (B) It applies only if the last preceding section prescribes no imprisonment
- (C) It imposes punishment in addition to the punishment provided by the last preceding section
- (D) It applies only when the last preceding section is not invoked
24.Must both an anonymous communication and precautions to conceal the sender's name or abode exist together for Section 507 to be attracted?
- (A) Yes — both conditions must be present together
- (B) No — either an anonymous communication or precautions to conceal the name/abode is sufficient
- (C) Section 507 applies only to anonymous communications and not to concealment of abode
- (D) Section 507 applies only when both name and abode are concealed, not just one
25.Section 508 IPC criminalises inducing a person to act or omit by making that person believe they will be subjected to what?
- (A) Divine displeasure
- (B) Bodily harm
- (C) Criminal prosecution
- (D) Civil liability
26.Which of the following kinds of conduct is directly covered by Section 508 IPC?
- (A) Inducing a person to perform a duty which he is legally bound to perform
- (B) Inducing a person to do something which that person is not legally bound to do
- (C) Using physical force to make a person act
- (D) Committing fraud to obtain property
27.Does Section 508 IPC cover only completed inducements, or does it also include attempts to induce belief of Divine displeasure?
- (A) Only completed inducements are covered
- (B) Only if the offender actually causes Divine displeasure
- (C) It includes both voluntarily causing and attempts to cause such inducement
- (D) Only if the person threatened suffers actual harm
28.Would Section 508 IPC apply where the offender induces the victim by saying that some other person "in whom the victim is interested" will be made an object of Divine displeasure if the victim does not comply?
- (A) No — the threat must be to the victim personally
- (B) Yes — but only if the other person is a legal dependent
- (C) No — the other person must be present for the offence to arise
- (D) Yes — the section explicitly includes "any person in whom he is interested"
29.Which of the following scenarios is covered by Section 508 IPC?
- (A) Threatening that the person (or someone he cares about) will be rendered an object of Divine displeasure if he does not do (or if he does) a specified act
- (B) Promising that the person will receive Divine favour if he complies
- (C) Threatening civil or criminal proceedings to compel action
- (D) Offering money or gifts to induce compliance
30.Which of the following acts is covered by Section 509 of the IPC as an offence intending to insult the modesty of a woman?
- (A) Uttering an insulting word intending the woman to hear it
- (B) Making a gesture intending the woman to see it
- (C) Exhibiting an object intending the woman to see it
- (D) All of the above
31.What is the maximum punishment prescribed by Section 509 IPC?
- (A) Simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and also with fine
- (B) Simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, and also with fine
- (C) Imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and also with fine
- (D) Fine only
32.If a person exhibits an object intending that the object shall be seen by a woman so as to insult her modesty, does Section 509 apply?
- (A) No — Section 509 applies only to spoken words
- (B) No — Section 509 requires physical contact
- (C) Yes — exhibiting an object intending it be seen by the woman is expressly covered
- (D) Yes — but only if the object is obscene
33.Which of the following, by itself, is sufficient to constitute an offence under Section 509 even if no word, sound or gesture is directed at the woman?
- (A) Having someone else hear an insulting remark about her
- (B) Intruding upon the privacy of such woman
- (C) Exhibiting an object to third parties without intending the woman to see it
- (D) Uttering an insulting remark to a friend about the woman
34.An accused utters an insulting word but did not intend that the woman should hear it. Under Section 509, is the accused liable for the offence as per the provision's text?
- (A) No — not liable under Section 509 unless he also intruded upon the woman's privacy
- (B) Yes — liability exists as long as insulting words are uttered anywhere
- (C) No — Section 509 applies only to gestures
- (D) Yes — liability arises if anyone else relays the words to the woman
35.Which condition does Section 510 of the IPC require the accused to be in for the offence to apply?
- (A) In a state of intoxication
- (B) Acting with deliberate malicious intent
- (C) Under unsoundness of mind
- (D) Under the influence of narcotics only
36.What is the maximum term of simple imprisonment that Section 510 prescribes?
- (A) Ten hours
- (B) Twelve hours
- (C) Twenty-four hours
- (D) Twenty-four days
37.Under Section 510, in which location(s) must the intoxicated person appear and conduct himself for the offence to be made out?
- (A) Only inside his private residence
- (B) Any public place or any place which it is a trespass for him to enter
- (C) Only in a public park
- (D) Only in a place of public worship
38.Does Section 510 require that more than one person be annoyed for the offence to be made out?
- (A) No; causing annoyance to any person (even a single person) is sufficient
- (B) Yes; it requires annoyance to a majority of persons present
- (C) No; it requires annoyance only to a public officer
- (D) Yes; it requires annoyance to at least two persons
39.If an intoxicated person in a public place only causes annoyance to himself and no one else, does Section 510 apply?
- (A) Yes; the phrase 'any person' includes the person himself
- (B) No; 'any person' excludes the offender himself
- (C) Yes, but only if another person files a complaint
- (D) No; the section requires annoyance to at least two different persons
Answer key
1. B2. A3. C4. B5. B6. C7. A8. D9. B10. B11. A12. C13. D14. C15. A16. C17. B18. D19. A20. B21. D22. A23. C24. B25. A26. B27. C28. D29. A30. D31. A32. C33. B34. A35. A36. C37. B38. A39. A
Explanations
- 1. (B) Section 503 states that whoever "threatens another with any injury to his person, reputation or property... with intent to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that person to do any act... or to omit to do any act... commits criminal intimidation." The provision requires a threatening communication plus the specified intent, not actual infliction of injury or a written form.
- 2. (A) Section 503 expressly includes threats "to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested," so a threat to the reputation of such a third person is covered. The text does not limit this to relatives or require property to be threatened.
- 3. (C) Section 503 requires the threat to be "with intent to cause alarm to that person," referring to the person threatened. A threat intended only to alarm a third party does not satisfy that element. The provision does not require actual injury for the offence.
- 4. (B) Section 503 lists threats to "his person, reputation or property," and separately includes "to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested." It does not mention the property of a third person in whom the threatened person is interested, so a threat to a third party's property is not covered by that specific phrase.
- 5. (B) Section 504 requires that the offender intentionally insults and does so 'intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence.' Thus the provision demands either intention or knowledge about the likelihood of breach or offence.
- 6. (C) The provision states the offender 'shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.' The maximum imprisonment term specified is two years.
- 7. (A) Section 504 criminalises intentionally insulting 'and thereby gives provocation' when the offender is 'intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence.' The provision focuses on the offender's intention/knowledge, not on whether the provoked person actually commits the breach or offence.
- 8. (D) The provision requires that the actor 'intentionally insults, and thereby gives provocation' and does so 'intending or knowing it to be likely' that such provocation will cause a breach of the public peace or another offence. Therefore all those elements together are required.
- 9. (B) Section 504 specifies the mental element as 'intending or knowing it to be likely' that the provocation will cause a breach or an offence. The offender must have that intention or knowledge when giving the insult; mere subsequent awareness does not satisfy the provision's required mental state.
- 10. (B) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years," specifying five years as the maximum term. The text therefore sets five years as the upper limit of imprisonment.
- 11. (A) The provision explicitly states the offender "shall also be liable to fine," in addition to imprisonment. Thus both imprisonment and liability to fine are prescribed by the section.
- 12. (C) The provision covers "any place of worship" without qualifying that worship must be in progress, so an offence in a place of worship is covered regardless of whether a service is underway. The requirement to be "engaged in the performance of religious worship" applies to assemblies, not to places of worship.
- 13. (D) The provision specifies application to "any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies." Therefore an assembly not engaged in such performance is not covered by this section.
- 14. (C) The section states the offender "shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine," indicating both imprisonment (up to five years) and liability to fine are prescribed. It does not present them as alternatives.
- 15. (A) The provision states punishment as "imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years," indicating the maximum term is two years. No longer term is provided in this text.
- 16. (C) Section 506 states the offender "shall be punished with imprisonment... or with fine, or with both," so the provision expressly permits imprisonment, a fine, or both. It does not provide for death penalty or community service.
- 17. (B) The provision explicitly uses the phrase "imprisonment of either description," so it permits imprisonment of either description as a mode of punishment. It also separately provides for fine or both.
- 18. (D) Section 506 expressly provides punishment as "imprisonment... or with fine, or with both," which means the court may impose imprisonment alone, a fine alone, or both together. There is no condition in the text limiting both to particular durations.
- 19. (A) The provision states imprisonment "for a term which may extend to two years," indicating two years is the outer limit (maximum) and that courts may impose lesser terms. It does not make two years mandatory or remove an upper limit.
- 20. (B) The provision states: "criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication, or having taken precaution to conceal the name or abode of the person from whom the threat comes..." This shows the section covers either form of conduct (anonymous communication OR concealment of name/abode).
- 21. (D) The provision prescribes "imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years." Therefore the maximum term specified is two years.
- 22. (A) The provision punishes one who commits criminal intimidation "...or having taken precaution to conceal the name or abode of the person from whom the threat comes." Deliberately using a false return address is a precaution to conceal identity, so Section 507 would apply as worded.
- 23. (C) The provision expressly states the punishment under Section 507 is "in addition to the punishment provided for the offence by the last preceding section." Thus it is cumulative and applies along with that earlier punishment.
- 24. (B) The provision uses the disjunctive phrasing "by an anonymous communication, or having taken precaution to conceal the name or abode...", indicating either circumstance (anonymous communication OR concealment) suffices for Section 507 to apply.
- 25. (A) The section punishes anyone who induces a person to do or omit something by inducing that person to believe he or any person in whom he is interested "will become or will be rendered by some act of the offender an object of Divine displeasure." The provision specifically refers to Divine displeasure, not bodily harm, prosecution, or civil liability.
- 26. (B) The section applies where one "voluntarily causes or attempts to cause any person to do anything which that person is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do anything which he is legally entitled to do." Thus inducing a person to do something he is not legally bound to do is covered. The other options are not described in this provision.
- 27. (C) The provision begins with "Whoever voluntarily causes or attempts to cause..." and therefore expressly includes both causing and attempts to cause inducement to believe in Divine displeasure. It does not require that Divine displeasure actually occur or that actual harm result.
- 28. (D) The section expressly includes inducing belief that "he or any person in whom he is interested will become or will be rendered... an object of Divine displeasure." Therefore threats concerning a person in whom the victim is interested fall within the provision. The text contains no requirement that the other person be present or a legal dependent.
- 29. (A) The section criminalises inducing belief that the person "will become or will be rendered by some act of the offender an object of Divine displeasure" if he does or omits an act. Promises of Divine favour, legal threats, or material offers are not what this provision describes.
- 30. (D) Section 509 states that whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object intending that it shall be heard or seen by such woman, commits the offence. Therefore all the listed acts fall within the provision when done with the requisite intention.
- 31. (A) The provision explicitly prescribes punishment of simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and also with fine. No other punishment duration or fine-only option is mentioned in the text.
- 32. (C) Section 509 includes 'exhibits any object, intending that such ... object shall be seen, by such woman' as one of the acts that constitute the offence. The provision does not limit liability to words or require physical contact, nor does it condition liability on the object's obscenity in the text.
- 33. (B) The provision separately includes 'or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman' as constituting the offence, distinct from uttering words, making sounds or gestures, or exhibiting objects. Thus intrusion upon privacy alone, with the requisite intention, is sufficient under Section 509.
- 34. (A) Section 509 requires that the word, sound, gesture or object be uttered/made/exhibited 'intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen, by such woman,' or that the accused 'intrudes upon the privacy of such woman.' If there was no intention that she hear it, liability under this clause arises only if there was an intrusion upon her privacy.
- 35. (A) The provision begins: 'Whoever, in a state of intoxication, appears ...' so the statutory condition required is being in a state of intoxication. The text does not require malice, unsoundness of mind, or limit the condition to narcotics alone.
- 36. (C) Section 510 states punishment with 'simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty-four hours.' Therefore the maximum term of imprisonment is twenty-four hours.
- 37. (B) The provision specifies 'appears in any public place, or in any place which it is a trespass in him to enter,' so the offence applies in public places or places where it would be a trespass for him to enter. It does not confine liability to private residences, parks, or places of worship exclusively.
- 38. (A) The statute requires conduct 'as to cause annoyance to any person,' which means annoyance to any single person suffices. It does not require annoyance to multiple people or a public officer specifically.
- 39. (A) The provision uses the broad term 'any person,' which on its face includes any individual, including the intoxicated person. The text does not exclude the offender from the phrase 'any person.'