Practice paper — IPC Chapter 21 — Defamation
20 questions · answer key at the end · no time limit
samvidhan.co.in
1.Which of the following combinations of modes is expressly covered by Section 499 of the IPC as ways of making or publishing an imputation?
- (A) Words spoken only
- (B) Words intended to be read only
- (C) Signs or visible representations only
- (D) Words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations
2.Under Section 499, which mental element suffices to constitute defamation?
- (A) A mere desire to insult the person
- (B) Either intending to harm the person's reputation or knowing or having reason to believe the imputation will harm the person's reputation
- (C) Only actual knowledge that the imputation will harm the reputation
- (D) Only reckless disregard for whether the statement is true
3.A person publishes an imputation concerning someone but neither intended to harm nor knew or had reason to believe it would harm the person's reputation. Under Section 499, is this conduct described as defamation?
- (A) No, because the statute requires intending to harm or knowing/having reason to believe it will harm
- (B) Yes, publication of any imputation is defamation regardless of mental state
- (C) Yes, if the imputation is untrue it is automatically defamation
- (D) No, unless the imputation is in writing
4.If an imputation is conveyed by a caricature or other visible representation without any words, can it fall within Section 499?
- (A) No, Section 499 applies only to spoken or written words
- (B) Yes, because Section 499 expressly includes 'visible representations' as a mode
- (C) Only if the caricature is accompanied by publication in a newspaper
- (D) Only if the person who made it also wrote explanatory words
5.Does Section 499 require proof that the person's reputation was actually harmed before an act can be said to be defamation?
- (A) Yes — actual harm to reputation must be demonstrated in all cases
- (B) No — the section requires only intention to harm or knowledge/reason to believe the imputation will harm the reputation, not proof of actual harm
- (C) Yes — unless the imputation is by visible representation
- (D) No — proof of harm is irrelevant and never considered under Section 499
6.What is the maximum term of imprisonment that Section 500 IPC prescribes for defamation?
- (A) One year
- (B) Six months
- (C) Two years
- (D) Five years
7.Which type of imprisonment does Section 500 IPC specify for the offence of defamation?
- (A) Simple imprisonment
- (B) Rigorous imprisonment
- (C) Life imprisonment
- (D) Imprisonment with hard labour
8.Under Section 500 IPC, can a person who defames another be punished with both imprisonment and fine?
- (A) Only imprisonment can be imposed
- (B) Either imprisonment or fine or both can be imposed
- (C) Only fine can be imposed
- (D) No punishment can be imposed
9.Does Section 500 IPC prescribe a minimum term of imprisonment for defamation?
- (A) Yes, minimum one year
- (B) Yes, minimum one day
- (C) Yes, minimum two years
- (D) No, no minimum term is specified
10.Does Section 500 IPC apply when a person 'defames' himself?
- (A) Yes, the provision applies to any defamation including self-defamation
- (B) Yes, but only if published to third parties
- (C) No, the provision applies to defaming 'another' person
- (D) Only if a third party complains
11.What conduct is specifically penalised by Section 501 of the Indian Penal Code?
- (A) Printing or engraving matter known or reasonably believed to be defamatory of any person
- (B) Publishing spoken words that defame any person
- (C) Writing letters that criticize public policy
- (D) Insulting a person in their presence
12.What is the maximum term of simple imprisonment prescribed by Section 501 IPC?
- (A) One year
- (B) Two years
- (C) Three years
- (D) Six months
13.Which mental state does Section 501 require for the accused regarding the defamatory nature of the matter?
- (A) Actual knowledge only
- (B) Negligence or inadvertence
- (C) Knowing or having good reason to believe
- (D) Intention to harm only
14.Would Section 501 apply to a person who only publishes defamatory material but did not themselves print or engrave it?
- (A) Yes, because publishing is the same as printing
- (B) Yes, in all cases of publication
- (C) Only if the publisher is also the author
- (D) No, because the provision penalises "whoever prints or engraves" such matter
15.Can a court lawfully sentence imprisonment for more than two years under Section 501 by adding a fine?
- (A) Yes, adding a fine permits extending imprisonment beyond the stated term
- (B) No, imprisonment "may extend to two years" and the fine is additional but does not increase the imprisonment term
- (C) Yes, if the defendant is a repeat offender
- (D) No, the provision allows only a fine and not imprisonment
16.Which of the following acts is specifically criminalised by Section 502 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860?
- (A) Printing any defamatory matter.
- (B) Selling or offering for sale any printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter, knowing it contains such matter.
- (C) Writing or composing defamatory matter for private use.
- (D) Publishing defamatory matter in a newspaper without consent.
17.What is the maximum term of imprisonment that Section 502 prescribes for the offence?
- (A) One year
- (B) Three years
- (C) Two years
- (D) Six months
18.If a person offers for sale a printed pamphlet containing defamatory matter but no sale actually takes place, is that act covered by Section 502?
- (A) Yes, because the provision criminalises offering for sale as well as selling.
- (B) No, because an actual sale must occur for the offence to be made out.
- (C) Yes, but only if the pamphlet is engraved.
- (D) No, unless the seller also distributed it for free.
19.Does mere possession of a printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter constitute an offence under Section 502?
- (A) Yes, possession alone is enough under the section.
- (B) No, the section only penalises selling or offering for sale such substances.
- (C) Yes, but only if the possessor intends to exhibit it publicly.
- (D) No, possession is punishable only if the item is engraved.
20.Which mental element is required by Section 502 for criminal liability to arise?
- (A) Knowledge that the printed or engraved substance contains defamatory matter.
- (B) Strict liability irrespective of the seller's awareness.
- (C) Express intention to defame a specific person named in the material.
- (D) Only negligence as to whether the material is defamatory.
Answer key
Explanations
- 1. (D) Section 499 states that an imputation may be made 'by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations.' The provision therefore expressly lists all those modes together.
- 2. (B) Section 499 requires that the imputer be 'intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person.' Thus either intention to harm or knowledge/reason to believe harm suffices.
- 3. (A) Section 499 defines defamation as making or publishing an imputation 'intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm' a person's reputation. If neither intention nor such knowledge/reason exists, the provision's stated mental element is not satisfied.
- 4. (B) Section 499 covers imputation made 'by signs or by visible representations' in addition to words spoken or intended to be read. Thus a visible representation that imputes and meets the mental element can fall within Section 499.
- 5. (B) Section 499 defines defamation by the maker's state of mind: 'intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation.' The text therefore focuses on intention or knowledge/reason to believe harm, not on proof that harm actually occurred.
- 6. (C) Section 500 states punishment by simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years. Thus the maximum term prescribed is two years.
- 7. (A) Section 500 expressly provides for 'simple imprisonment' for defamation. No other form of imprisonment is mentioned in the provision.
- 8. (B) Section 500 states punishment 'with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.' Therefore imprisonment, or fine, or both may be imposed.
- 9. (D) Section 500 specifies that imprisonment 'may extend to two years,' which indicates a maximum limit; it does not prescribe any minimum term. Hence no minimum is specified in the provision.
- 10. (C) Section 500 penalises 'Whoever defames another,' which by its wording targets defamation of another person. The provision does not extend to defaming oneself.
- 11. (A) The provision states: "Whoever prints or engraves any matter, knowing or having good reason to believe that such matter is defamatory of any person, shall be punished..." It therefore penalises printing or engraving defamatory matter.
- 12. (B) Section 501 provides punishment with "simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both." Thus the maximum term of imprisonment is two years.
- 13. (C) The text requires the accused to be "knowing or having good reason to believe" that the matter is defamatory. Hence either actual knowledge or having good reason to believe suffices; mere negligence is not stated.
- 14. (D) The provision specifically speaks of "Whoever prints or engraves any matter..." and does not by its wording penalise mere publication by someone who did not print or engrave. Therefore it targets the act of printing or engraving.
- 15. (B) Section 501 prescribes "simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both." The imprisonment term is capped at two years; a fine may be imposed in addition but does not increase that maximum term.
- 16. (B) Section 502 punishes ‘‘whoever sells or offers for sale any printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter, knowing that it contains such matter’’. The provision does not criminalise mere printing, composing, or general publication in the language used.
- 17. (C) Section 502 provides punishment with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years. The text expressly specifies two years as the maximum term.
- 18. (A) Section 502 expressly uses the phrase ‘‘sells or offers for sale’’, so offering for sale is within the offence even if no sale occurs. The provision does not limit liability to completed sales.
- 19. (B) Section 502 targets those who ‘‘sell or offer for sale’’ defamatory printed or engraved substances. Mere possession is not mentioned and therefore is not criminalised by the provision itself.
- 20. (A) Section 502 requires the act to be done ‘‘knowing that it contains such matter’’, so knowledge of the defamatory content is a necessary mens rea. The provision does not create strict liability, nor does it limit liability to an express intention to defame a specific person.