सं Samvidhan
Or take it online, timed →
संSamvidhan

Practice paper — BNS Chapter XVII — Of Offences Against Property

50 questions · answer key at the end · no time limit · 157 more on the site

Scan to practise online

samvidhan.co.in

  1. 1.Under Section 303(1) of the BNS, theft is committed when a person, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent, does what?

    • (A) Merely forms the intention to take it
    • (B) Moves that property in order to such taking
    • (C) Sells the property to a third party
    • (D) Retains the property for more than a day

  2. 2.A, having pawned his own watch to Z, takes it back out of Z's possession without Z's consent and without repaying the loan. Under Section 303 BNS, A has:

    • (A) Committed no offence, because the watch is his own property
    • (B) Committed theft, because he takes it dishonestly even though the watch is his own property
    • (C) Committed extortion
    • (D) Committed criminal misappropriation only

  3. 3.Which of the following is a necessary ingredient of snatching under Section 304 BNS?

    • (A) The property must be worth more than five thousand rupees
    • (B) All the ingredients of theft must be present, with the seizure being sudden, quick or forcible
    • (C) The victim must suffer hurt during the taking
    • (D) The offence must occur on a public way after sunset

  4. 4.What is the maximum punishment under Section 305 of the BNS for theft in a dwelling house or of government property?

    • (A) Three years' imprisonment
    • (B) Five years' imprisonment
    • (C) Seven years' imprisonment and fine
    • (D) Ten years' rigorous imprisonment

  5. 5.Under Section 305 BNS, theft of an idol attracts the aggravated punishment when it is committed:

    • (A) Anywhere, including a private collection
    • (B) In any place of worship
    • (C) Only in a temple managed by the Government
    • (D) Only if the idol is made of precious metal

  6. 6.What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by Section 306?

    • (A) Imprisonment up to three years
    • (B) Imprisonment up to five years
    • (C) Imprisonment up to seven years
    • (D) Imprisonment up to ten years

  7. 7.Under Section 307 (Theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, what is the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed?

    • (A) Seven years
    • (B) Ten years
    • (C) Life imprisonment
    • (D) Five years

  8. 8.Illustration (b) describes A picking Z's pocket after posting companions nearby to restrain Z if Z perceives the act or resists. Does the section apply even if the companions did not actually restrain Z?

    • (A) No — the section applies only if the companions actually restrained Z
    • (B) Yes — the section applies because posting companions as preparation suffices
    • (C) No — the section applies only if Z was injured
    • (D) Yes — but only if the theft was successful

  9. 9.A threatens Z that he will send club-men to plough up Z’s field unless Z signs and delivers to B a bond, and Z signs and delivers the bond to B. Who is guilty of extortion under Section 308?

    • (A) Only B is guilty of extortion because B receives the bond.
    • (B) Neither A nor B is guilty unless A personally keeps the bond.
    • (C) Only Z is guilty for signing under fear.
    • (D) A is guilty of extortion although the bond is delivered to B.

  10. 10.What is the punishment for robbery under Section 309(4) BNS when it is committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise?

    • (A) Rigorous imprisonment which may extend to ten years
    • (B) Rigorous imprisonment which may extend to fourteen years
    • (C) Imprisonment for life in all cases
    • (D) Simple imprisonment up to seven years

  11. 11.Under Section 309(6) BNS, if one member of a group voluntarily causes hurt in committing robbery, what is the liability of the other persons jointly concerned in committing that robbery?

    • (A) They are liable only for simple robbery under Section 309(4)
    • (B) They are liable only if they personally caused hurt
    • (C) They too shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years, and fine
    • (D) They are liable only for abetment with half the punishment

  12. 12.If a person is one of five or more persons assembled for the purpose of committing dacoity (but before the dacoity is actually committed), the maximum punishment under Section 310 is:

    • (A) Life imprisonment
    • (B) Rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years
    • (C) Rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years
    • (D) No imprisonment, only fine

  13. 13.Under Section 311 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, what is the minimum imprisonment prescribed when the conditions of the section are met?

    • (A) Not less than seven years
    • (B) Not less than three years
    • (C) At least ten years
    • (D) Life imprisonment

  14. 14.If the offender uses a deadly weapon only after the robbery has been completed (i.e., not 'at the time of committing' the robbery), does Section 311's minimum sentence apply?

    • (A) Yes — the section applies to any use of a deadly weapon related to the robbery
    • (B) No — the section applies only if the weapon is used at the time of committing the robbery or dacoity
    • (C) Yes — if the weapon is used within 24 hours of the robbery
    • (D) Only if the weapon use was to facilitate escape

  15. 15.What minimum period of imprisonment does Section 312 prescribe for an offender armed with a deadly weapon while attempting robbery or dacoity?

    • (A) Exactly seven years.
    • (B) Not less than seven years.
    • (C) Up to seven years.
    • (D) Seven months.

  16. 16.According to Section 313, what is the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for belonging to a gang habitually committing theft or robbery (not being a gang of dacoits)?

    • (A) Three years
    • (B) Five years
    • (C) Seven years
    • (D) Ten years

  17. 17.Would a gang habitually committing burglary (but not theft or robbery) fall within the scope of this provision?

    • (A) Only if the burglary is committed at night
    • (B) Yes, burglary is covered under this section
    • (C) No, it applies only to theft or robbery
    • (D) Only if the burglary involves misappropriation

  18. 18.Does a 'dishonest misappropriation for a time only' fall within the meaning of Section 314?

    • (A) Yes, temporary misappropriation is included
    • (B) No, only permanent appropriation is included
    • (C) Only if the finder intended to permanently deprive the owner
    • (D) Only if the property was pledged or sold

  19. 19.Which statement correctly reflects the law in Explanation 2 to Section 314 regarding a finder who later appropriates found property to his own use?

    • (A) A finder must know the owner's identity to be guilty of misappropriation.
    • (B) A finder is not guilty if he took the property to protect or restore it and used reasonable means and kept it a reasonable time; otherwise he is guilty if he appropriates it.
    • (C) A finder is guilty only if he sells the property and obtains money.
    • (D) A finder is guilty only when the property was in someone's possession at the time it was found.

  20. 20.A person misappropriates money that was in the deceased's possession at death, but the money had already come into the physical possession of a person legally entitled to it before the misappropriation. Is the misappropriation punishable under Section 315?

    • (A) Yes, because the money was originally in the deceased's possession at death.
    • (B) No, because the property had since been in the possession of a person legally entitled to such possession.
    • (C) Yes, but only if the entitled person consented to the misappropriation.
    • (D) Only if the misappropriator was a clerk or servant.

  21. 21.Under Section 316(1) of the BNS, criminal breach of trust is committed by a person who is entrusted with property and:

    • (A) Negligently loses the property entrusted to him
    • (B) Dishonestly misappropriates or converts that property to his own use
    • (C) Fails to insure the property against damage
    • (D) Refuses to accept entrustment of the property

  22. 22.A, an agent, is directed by Z to invest remitted money in Company's paper. A, in good faith believing it more advantageous for Z, instead buys Bank of Bengal shares for Z, and Z suffers loss. Per the illustrations to Section 316 BNS, A:

    • (A) Has committed criminal breach of trust because he violated Z's express directions
    • (B) Has committed criminal breach of trust because Z suffered loss
    • (C) Is criminally liable but with reduced punishment
    • (D) Has not committed criminal breach of trust because he did not act dishonestly, though Z may sue him civilly

  23. 23.If possession of property was transferred by theft outside India, is that property treated as 'stolen property' under Section 317(1)?

    • (A) No, only transfers within India are covered
    • (B) Yes, but only if later brought into India
    • (C) Yes, property remains designated as stolen whether the transfer was made within or without India
    • (D) Only if the theft is reported to Indian authorities

  24. 24.Under Section 318(1) of the BNS, the offence of cheating essentially requires:

    • (A) Deceiving a person and fraudulently or dishonestly inducing him to deliver property, or intentionally inducing him to do or omit something causing or likely to cause damage or harm
    • (B) Merely making a false statement to another person
    • (C) Entrustment of property followed by its misappropriation
    • (D) Taking movable property out of another's possession without consent

  25. 25.Under Section 318(3) of the BNS, an enhanced punishment of up to five years applies where the cheater:

    • (A) Cheats by using a forged document
    • (B) Cheats a public servant during official duty
    • (C) Knows he is likely to cause wrongful loss to a person whose interest in the transaction he was bound, by law or legal contract, to protect
    • (D) Cheats and induces delivery of property worth over one lakh rupees

  26. 26.What is the maximum punishment for cheating by personation under Section 319(2) of the BNS?

    • (A) Imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both
    • (B) Imprisonment up to seven years and fine
    • (C) Imprisonment up to two years only
    • (D) Imprisonment up to five years, or fine, or both

  27. 27.Which of the following correctly distinguishes cheating by personation under Section 319 BNS from simple cheating under Section 318 BNS?

    • (A) Section 319 requires that the person personated must actually exist, unlike Section 318
    • (B) Section 319 carries a lower maximum punishment than simple cheating
    • (C) Section 319 does not require any deception at all
    • (D) Cheating by personation is a species of cheating where the deception consists in pretending to be another person, and it carries up to five years' imprisonment against three years for simple cheating

  28. 28.Does Section 320 apply to a transfer of property that was made for adequate consideration?

    • (A) Yes, any transfer intended to prevent distribution among creditors is covered, regardless of consideration
    • (B) No, the offence applies only to transfers made without adequate consideration
    • (C) Yes, but only if the consideration was paid in instalments
    • (D) Only if the transfer was to a relative

  29. 29.Which mental state does Section 321 require for the offence?

    • (A) Dishonestly or fraudulently
    • (B) Negligence
    • (C) Recklessness
    • (D) Strict liability (no mental element)

  30. 30.Must the debt or demand be already due for Section 321 to apply?

    • (A) No, section applies only when a debt or demand is due
    • (B) Yes, it applies equally to future or contingent debts
    • (C) Only if a court has already declared the debt due
    • (D) Only if the debt is due to the State

  31. 31.If a person innocently (without dishonesty or fraud) signs a deed that contains a false statement relating to the consideration, is that person punishable under Section 322?

    • (A) Yes — mere presence of a false statement is enough.
    • (B) No — the provision requires the act to be done dishonestly or fraudulently.
    • (C) Yes — but only if the false statement causes financial loss to another.
    • (D) Yes — but only if the deed is registered.

  32. 32.Which of the following acts is explicitly criminalised by Section 323 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

    • (A) Honest removal of one’s own property
    • (B) Dishonestly or fraudulently concealing or removing any property of himself or any other person
    • (C) Dishonestly releasing a demand to which he is not entitled
    • (D) Civil breach of trust regarding property

  33. 33.Does Section 323 apply to a removal or concealment that is done honestly (without dishonesty or fraud)?

    • (A) Yes, all concealment or removal is punished regardless of intent
    • (B) Yes, but only if the property belongs to another person
    • (C) Yes, if the removal results in loss to the owner
    • (D) No, the provision requires the act to be done 'dishonestly or fraudulently' to be punishable

  34. 34.Can a person commit mischief by destroying or damaging property that belongs to himself under the provision?

    • (A) Yes — mischief may be committed by an act affecting property belonging to the person who commits the act
    • (B) No — mischief requires the property to belong to another person
    • (C) Only if the property is jointly owned with another person
    • (D) Only if the destruction causes death or hurt

  35. 35.Which clause of Section 324 imposes an enhanced punishment when the offender 'having made preparation for causing to any person death, or hurt, or wrongful restraint, or fear of death, or of hurt, or of wrongful restraint' commits mischief?

    • (A) The general punishment clause for mischief (up to six months)
    • (B) The clause for causing damage to Government or Local Authority property (up to one year)
    • (C) The clause for causing loss of one lakh rupees or upwards (up to five years)
    • (D) The clause prescribing punishment where the offender had made such preparations (up to five years and fine)

  36. 36.Does poisoning an animal fall within the scope of Section 325 as an offence of mischief?

    • (A) No, poisoning is not included
    • (B) Only if poisoning leads to destruction of property
    • (C) Only if the owner of the animal files a complaint
    • (D) Yes, poisoning an animal is expressly included

  37. 37.Which clause of Section 326 deals with destroying or moving any land‑mark fixed by the authority of a public servant?

    • (A) Clause (a)
    • (B) Clause (c)
    • (C) Clause (e)
    • (D) Clause (g)

  38. 38.Which statement correctly captures the distinction in punishment between clause (f) and clause (g) of Section 326?

    • (A) Both (f) and (g) prescribe imprisonment which may extend to seven years only.
    • (B) (f) prescribes imprisonment which may extend to seven years and fine; (g) prescribes imprisonment for life, or imprisonment which may extend to ten years, and fine.
    • (C) (f) prescribes imprisonment for life; (g) prescribes imprisonment which may extend to seven years.
    • (D) (g) prescribes imprisonment which may extend to one year; (f) prescribes imprisonment which may extend to ten years.

  39. 39.Under subsection (2), mischief committed or attempted by fire or any explosive substance is punishable by which of the following?

    • (A) Only imprisonment for life
    • (B) Only imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years
    • (C) Imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and fine
    • (D) Fine and community service

  40. 40.Which of the following actions constitutes the physical act prohibited by Section 328?

    • (A) Intentionally running any vessel aground or ashore
    • (B) Anchoring a vessel in deep sea to avoid a storm
    • (C) Navigating a vessel lawfully into a port
    • (D) Abandoning a vessel at sea without intent to misappropriate property

  41. 41.Can Section 328 apply where the vessel contains no property at the time the vessel is run aground?

    • (A) Yes — the offence is complete upon running the vessel aground regardless of property being present
    • (B) Yes — it suffices that the accused intended theft generally even if no property was present in the vessel
    • (C) Yes — only if the vessel had carried property earlier on the same voyage
    • (D) No — the provision specifically requires intent to steal or dishonestly misappropriate property contained in the vessel, so absence of such property removes that element

  42. 42.What is the maximum punishment for 'house-trespass' under Section 329(4)?

    • (A) Imprisonment up to three months, or fine up to five thousand rupees, or both.
    • (B) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.
    • (C) Imprisonment up to two years, or fine up to ten thousand rupees.
    • (D) Only a fine up to five thousand rupees, with no imprisonment.

  43. 43.If a person enters a deserted cottage (not in the possession of another) used as a human dwelling with intent to commit an offence, is that an offence under Section 329?

    • (A) No — Section 329(1) requires the property to be in the possession of another for criminal trespass to arise.
    • (B) Yes — any entry into a building used as a human dwelling with intent to commit an offence is house-trespass regardless of possession.
    • (C) Yes — intent to commit an offence alone suffices for criminal trespass even without possession by another.
    • (D) No — entry into buildings used as dwellings is never an offence under Section 329.

  44. 44.A trespasser finds the key that the occupier had lost and opens the occupier’s locked door to enter. Under Section 330 illustrations, this act is:

    • (A) Not house-breaking if the key was merely found and not stolen
    • (B) House-breaking only if the occupier had locked the door intending to prevent entrance
    • (C) House-trespass but not house-breaking because no force was used
    • (D) House-breaking — entering by opening a lock with a key found is house-breaking

  45. 45.What is the punishment under Section 331(2) when lurking house-trespass or house-breaking is committed after sunset and before sunrise (with no other aggravating intention)?

    • (A) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and fine
    • (B) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and fine
    • (C) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and fine
    • (D) Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to fourteen years, and fine

  46. 46.Which condition does Section 331(8) expressly require for every person jointly concerned in a night-time lurking house-trespass or house-breaking to be punishable with imprisonment for life or up to ten years?

    • (A) That any person guilty of the offence, at the time of the night-time offence, shall voluntarily cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt
    • (B) That only the actual assailant who caused grievous hurt can be punished with life; joint offenders are not liable under this clause
    • (C) That the offence must have been committed in order to commit theft
    • (D) That the offenders must have made prior preparation for causing hurt, assault, wrongful restraint, or putting any person in fear

  47. 47.Where the offence intended to be committed is punishable with imprisonment for life, what is the maximum term of imprisonment for the house-trespass under Section 332?

    • (A) Two years
    • (B) Imprisonment for life
    • (C) Ten years
    • (D) Fine only

  48. 48.Which combination of elements is required to attract punishment under Section 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

    • (A) Commits house-trespass having made preparation for causing hurt, assault, wrongful restraint, or putting any person in fear of those acts.
    • (B) Commits house-trespass alone, irrespective of any preparation or intent.
    • (C) Makes preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint even if no house-trespass occurs.
    • (D) Commits house-trespass after preparing to commit theft or other property offences.

  49. 49.If a person commits house-trespass after preparing to assault someone but no assault or hurt actually occurs, is Section 333 attracted?

    • (A) No — an actual assault or hurt must occur for Section 333 to apply.
    • (B) Only if the trespass caused the person to be put in fear.
    • (C) Yes — the section applies where there is house-trespass coupled with preparation for assault even if no assault or hurt takes place.
    • (D) Only if the preparation included an attempt to carry out the assault during the trespass.

  50. 50.What is the maximum punishment specified in Section 334(1)?

    • (A) Imprisonment which may extend to five years, or fine, or both.
    • (B) Imprisonment which may extend to one year, or fine, or both.
    • (C) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
    • (D) Only fine; no imprisonment is provided.

Answer key

1. B2. B3. B4. C5. B6. C7. B8. B9. D10. B11. C12. C13. A14. B15. B16. C17. C18. A19. B20. B21. B22. D23. C24. A25. C26. D27. D28. B29. A30. A31. B32. B33. D34. A35. D36. D37. C38. B39. C40. A41. D42. B43. A44. D45. B46. A47. C48. A49. C50. C

Explanations

  1. 1. (B) Section 303(1) defines theft as moving the property 'in order to such taking' with dishonest intention, without the possessor's consent. The offence is complete upon the moving of the property; asportation beyond that point is not required.
  2. 2. (B) Illustration (k) to Section 303 states that A commits theft in taking his pawned watch from Z without consent and without paying the debt, 'though the watch is his own property,' because the taking is dishonest. Ownership is no defence where the property is lawfully in another's possession.
  3. 3. (B) Section 304(1) opens with 'Theft is snatching if...', meaning snatching is a species of theft; all the elements of theft must exist, coupled with the sudden, quick or forcible seizing, securing, grabbing or taking away. Neither hurt to the victim nor any minimum property value is required.
  4. 4. (C) Section 305 BNS prescribes imprisonment of either description up to seven years, and the offender shall also be liable to fine. This is an aggravated form of theft compared with the three-year maximum for simple theft under Section 303(2).
  5. 5. (B) Clause (d) of Section 305 covers theft 'of idol or icon in any place of worship.' The location — a place of worship — is the qualifying element; the section does not distinguish by the idol's material or the management of the place.
  6. 6. (C) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years," so the maximum term specified is seven years. The section therefore does not provide for terms of three, five or ten years.
  7. 7. (B) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine." Therefore the maximum term specified is ten years.
  8. 8. (B) Illustration (b) concludes: "A has committed the offence defined in this section" where A had "posted several of his companions... in order that they may restrain Z." This shows mere preparation (posting companions) intended to facilitate the theft suffices even if they did not act.
  9. 9. (D) Illustration (c) to Section 308(1) states that A threatens Z to induce Z to sign and deliver a bond to B, and thereby induces Z; A has committed extortion. The fact that delivery is to B does not prevent A’s liability.
  10. 10. (B) Section 309(4) punishes robbery with rigorous imprisonment up to ten years and fine, but if the robbery is committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.
  11. 11. (C) Section 309(6) provides that if any person voluntarily causes hurt in committing or attempting robbery, 'such person, and any other person jointly concerned' shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years plus fine. Joint participants thus share the aggravated liability even without personally causing the hurt.
  12. 12. (C) Section 310(5) states that whoever is one of five or more persons assembled for the purpose of committing dacoity shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
  13. 13. (A) The provision states that if the offender uses a deadly weapon, causes grievous hurt, or attempts to cause death or grievous hurt while committing robbery or dacoity, "the imprisonment with which such offender shall be punished shall not be less than seven years." Thus the minimum is seven years.
  14. 14. (B) Section 311 begins with the qualifying phrase "If, at the time of committing robbery or dacoity," and then lists the acts that trigger the minimum. Therefore the minimum applies only when the deadly weapon is used (or grievous hurt caused/attempted) at the time of committing the offence.
  15. 15. (B) The provision states that the imprisonment with which such offender shall be punished shall not be less than seven years, which means a mandatory minimum of seven years rather than an exact or maximum term of seven years.
  16. 16. (C) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years," indicating a maximum of seven years. The text explicitly gives seven years as the upper limit.
  17. 17. (C) The provision specifies association in habitually committing "theft or robbery." It does not mention burglary, so from the text alone the section applies only to theft or robbery and not to burglary.
  18. 18. (A) Explanation 1 expressly provides that a dishonest misappropriation for a time only is a misappropriation within the meaning of this section.
  19. 19. (B) Explanation 2 states that a finder who takes property to protect or restore it is not guilty provided he uses reasonable means to discover and give notice to the owner and keeps it a reasonable time; otherwise he is guilty if he appropriates it to his own use.
  20. 20. (B) Section 315 applies where the property "has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to such possession." If the property has since been in the possession of a legally entitled person, the offence as defined in this section is not made out.
  21. 21. (B) Section 316(1) BNS defines criminal breach of trust as dishonest misappropriation or conversion to one's own use of property entrusted, or dishonest use or disposal in violation of a direction of law or legal contract. Mere negligence without dishonesty does not attract the section.
  22. 22. (D) Illustration (d) to Section 316 BNS states that where the agent disobeys directions not dishonestly but in good faith for the principal's advantage, no criminal breach of trust is committed even if loss results. Z's remedy is a civil action; dishonesty is the essential ingredient of the offence.
  23. 23. (C) Section 317(1) states that such property is designated as stolen property whether the transfer has been made within or without India. There is no requirement in the provision that it be brought into India or reported for the designation to apply.
  24. 24. (A) Section 318(1) BNS defines cheating as deceiving any person and thereby fraudulently or dishonestly inducing delivery of property or consent to its retention, or intentionally inducing an act or omission that causes or is likely to cause damage or harm in body, mind, reputation or property. Entrustment followed by misappropriation is criminal breach of trust, not cheating.
  25. 25. (C) Section 318(3) BNS applies where the offender cheats with knowledge that he is likely to cause wrongful loss to a person whose interest in the transaction he was bound, either by law or by a legal contract, to protect, and prescribes imprisonment up to five years, or fine, or both. There is no monetary threshold in the provision.
  26. 26. (D) Section 319(2) BNS punishes cheating by personation with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. This is higher than the three-year maximum for simple cheating under Section 318(2).
  27. 27. (D) Section 319(1) BNS begins with 'if he cheats by pretending...', making personation an aggravated form of cheating in which the deception is as to identity. Its punishment under Section 319(2) extends to five years, compared with three years for simple cheating under Section 318(2), and the Explanation clarifies the personated individual may even be imaginary.
  28. 28. (B) The provision specifically criminalises transfers 'without adequate consideration'. Therefore transfers made for adequate consideration are outside the offence as described in the text.
  29. 29. (A) The section begins with "Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently prevents...", so the offence requires a dishonest or fraudulent mental state. Negligence, recklessness or strict liability are not mentioned in the provision.
  30. 30. (A) The section criminalises preventing "any debt or demand due to himself or to any other person" from being made available; the wording requires a debt or demand that is due. The provision does not refer to future or contingent debts, court declarations, or State-only debts.
  31. 31. (B) Section 322 applies to "Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently signs, executes or becomes a party to" such a deed. The mental element of dishonesty or fraud is therefore required in addition to the false statement about consideration.
  32. 32. (B) The provision states: 'Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently conceals or removes any property of himself or any other person... shall be punished...' Thus dishonest or fraudulent concealment or removal is criminalised. The text does not penalise honest removal or label mere civil breaches as this offence.
  33. 33. (D) Section 323 begins with 'Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently conceals or removes...' which shows the mental element of dishonesty or fraud is required. Honest concealment or removal is therefore outside the offence as defined by the provision.
  34. 34. (A) Explanation 2 to Section 324 expressly states that mischief may be committed by an act affecting property belonging to the person who commits the act, or to that person and others jointly; ownership by another is not a prerequisite.
  35. 35. (D) Section 324(6) states that whoever commits mischief, having made preparation for causing death, hurt, wrongful restraint or fear thereof, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine; this is the specific enhanced punishment clause for such preparations.
  36. 36. (D) The provision specifically lists "poisoning" among the acts: "killing, poisoning, maiming or rendering useless any animal." Therefore poisoning an animal is expressly within the scope of Section 325.
  37. 37. (C) Clause (e) expressly deals with “destroying or moving any land‑mark fixed by the authority of a public servant,” and prescribes punishment up to one year, or fine, or both.
  38. 38. (B) Clause (f) covers fire or explosive intending damage to property and prescribes imprisonment up to seven years and liable to fine. Clause (g) deals with destruction of buildings used as place of worship or human dwelling and prescribes imprisonment for life, or imprisonment up to ten years, and liable to fine.
  39. 39. (C) Subsection (2) prescribes punishment "with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine." Thus both life and a term up to ten years are possible, plus fine.
  40. 40. (A) Section 328 penalises whoever intentionally runs any vessel aground or ashore; the provision's prohibited physical act is the intentional running aground or ashore of a vessel.
  41. 41. (D) The text of Section 328 refers to theft of or dishonest misappropriation of property contained in the vessel; if no property is contained in the vessel, the requisite intent concerning property 'contained therein' is absent, so the provision's element is not satisfied.
  42. 42. (B) Section 329(4) prescribes punishment for house-trespass as imprisonment (either description) which may extend to one year, or fine up to five thousand rupees, or both. The three-month term in subsection (3) applies to criminal trespass, not house-trespass.
  43. 43. (A) Section 329(1) defines criminal trespass in relation to property 'in the possession of another.' Subsection (2) treats certain entries as house-trespass only when they constitute criminal trespass. Therefore, where the property is not in another’s possession, Section 329 does not apply.
  44. 44. (D) Illustration (f) states that if A finds the key of Z’s house door which Z had lost and enters after opening the door with that key, this is house-breaking. The provision treats entry by opening a lock (even with a found key) as house-breaking.
  45. 45. (B) Section 331(2) provides that lurking house-trespass or house-breaking after sunset and before sunrise shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.
  46. 46. (A) Section 331(8) specifies that if, at the time of committing lurking house-trespass or house-breaking after sunset and before sunrise, any person guilty of such offence shall voluntarily cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, then every person jointly concerned shall be punishable with imprisonment for life or up to ten years. The clause thus requires the voluntary causing or attempting of death/grievous hurt by a person during the night-time offence.
  47. 47. (C) Clause (b) provides that if the intended offence is punishable with imprisonment for life, the house-trespasser shall be punished "with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding ten years, and shall also be liable to fine." Therefore the maximum term is ten years.
  48. 48. (A) Section 333 applies where a person "commits house-trespass, having made preparation for causing hurt ... or for assault ... or for wrongfully restraining ... or for putting any person in fear" — both house-trespass and preparation for those specified harms are required. Preparations for unrelated crimes like theft are not covered by this provision.
  49. 49. (C) Section 333 criminalises "house-trespass, having made preparation for causing hurt ... or for assault ..."; it requires the preparatory intention plus trespass, not the occurrence of actual hurt or assault. Thus absence of actual assault does not preclude application of the section.
  50. 50. (C) Section 334(1) prescribes punishment by imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. The provision thus allows imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both.

Questions generated from the statute text and independently verified against it. Free to print, photocopy and hand out, including in a coaching centre — please leave this attribution on. Full text, explainers and 10,000+ more questions at samvidhan.co.in