Practice paper — BNS Chapter VI — Of Offences Affecting The Human Body
50 questions · answer key at the end · no time limit · 234 more on the site
samvidhan.co.in
1.Under Section 100 BNS, culpable homicide is committed when a person causes death by doing an act with—
- (A) The intention of causing death, or the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or the knowledge that the act is likely to cause death
- (B) Negligence alone
- (C) Only a premeditated design to kill
- (D) Any unlawful intention whatsoever
2.Under Explanation 3 to Section 100 BNS, which statement about the death of a child is correct?
- (A) Causing the death of a child in the mother's womb is not homicide, but causing the death of a living child may amount to culpable homicide if any part of the child has been brought forth, even though the child has not breathed or been completely born
- (B) Causing the death of a child in the womb is always culpable homicide
- (C) Causing the death of a partly born child is culpable homicide only if the child has breathed
- (D) The death of a child can amount to culpable homicide only after complete birth
3.A strikes Z, knowing Z suffers from a disease such that the blow is likely to cause his death, intending only bodily injury; Z dies. Had A not known of the disease, the same blow would not ordinarily kill a healthy person. Which analysis under Section 101 BNS is correct?
- (A) A is guilty of murder in both situations, since death in fact resulted
- (B) With knowledge of the disease A is guilty of murder under clause (b); without that knowledge he is not guilty of murder, as he intended neither death nor an injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death
- (C) A is not guilty of murder in either situation because the blow was not ordinarily fatal
- (D) A's liability depends solely on whether the injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death
4.Which statement best captures the legal effect provided by Section 102?
- (A) The legal characterization of culpable homicide is determined by characteristics of the actual deceased
- (B) The provision applies only when the actual victim was unknown at the time of the act
- (C) The culpable homicide is of the description it would have been if the death of the person whose death the actor intended or knew to be likely had occurred
- (D) The provision requires the actor to have intended the death of the actual victim
5.Which of the following grounds is NOT expressly enumerated in Section 103(2) of the BNS as a basis for group murder?
- (A) Political affiliation
- (B) Place of birth
- (C) Language
- (D) Personal belief
6.Under Section 104, what is the meaning of the phrase "imprisonment for life" when imposed as punishment?
- (A) A fixed term of 20 years
- (B) A fixed term as specified by the court
- (C) Until remission under prison rules
- (D) The remainder of that person’s natural life
7.A does an act knowing it is likely to cause death, but with no intention to cause death or bodily injury likely to cause death, and the act causes death amounting to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Which punishment limb of Section 105 BNS applies?
- (A) Imprisonment for life, or five to ten years, and fine
- (B) Imprisonment up to ten years and fine
- (C) Death or imprisonment for life
- (D) Imprisonment up to five years or fine or both
8.Section 106(2) BNS prescribes imprisonment up to ten years for causing death by rash and negligent driving of a vehicle when the offender:
- (A) Was driving without a valid licence
- (B) Escapes without reporting the incident to a police officer or a Magistrate soon after
- (C) Was driving under the influence of alcohol
- (D) Causes the death of more than one person
9.If a person of sound mind (not delirious, not intoxicated, and not a child) commits suicide after being abetted, does Section 107 apply to the abettor?
- (A) Yes — Section 107 applies to any abetted suicide
- (B) Yes — but only if the abettor acted with intent to kill
- (C) No — Section 107 applies only where the suicide is by a child, person of unsound mind, delirious person or person in a state of intoxication
- (D) Only if the person was a minor
10.Which two ingredients must both be established for an offence under Section 108 BNS?
- (A) Attempt to commit suicide and presence of the accused
- (B) Commission of suicide by a person and abetment of that suicide by the accused
- (C) Instigation to suicide and a written suicide note
- (D) Cruelty by the accused and death of the victim
11.What is the maximum punishment prescribed by Section 109(1) where the act does not cause hurt to any person?
- (A) Imprisonment for life and fine.
- (B) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and liable to fine.
- (C) Death penalty.
- (D) No punishment unless death ensues.
12.What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by Section 110 where no hurt is caused by the act?
- (A) One year
- (B) Five years
- (C) Three years
- (D) Seven years
13.Under Section 111(2)(a) BNS, if the commission of organised crime results in the death of any person, the offender shall be punished with:
- (A) Imprisonment for life only and fine of five lakh rupees
- (B) Imprisonment of not less than five years and fine
- (C) Rigorous imprisonment of ten years and fine of two lakh rupees
- (D) Death or imprisonment for life, and fine not less than ten lakh rupees
14.According to Section 112(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which of the following best describes 'petty organised crime'?
- (A) Any act of theft or similar listed offences committed by a person who is a member of a group or gang, whether committed singly or jointly.
- (B) Any act of theft or similar listed offences committed by any individual, regardless of group membership.
- (C) Only offences committed jointly by all members of a group or gang.
- (D) Only large-scale organised offences involving multiple gangs.
15.Under Section 113(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which mental state is expressly required for an act to be a 'terrorist act'?
- (A) Intent to threaten the unity, integrity, sovereignty, security, or economic security of India or to strike terror in the people
- (B) Intent to cause private financial gain
- (C) Intent to offend religious sentiments
- (D) Intent to commit a simple theft
16.According to Section 114, which of the following acts constitutes 'hurt'?
- (A) Causing bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person
- (B) Causing only mental anguish without bodily harm
- (C) Damaging another person's property
- (D) Making insulting remarks that hurt someone's feelings
17.If a person causes bodily pain to themselves, does Section 114 describe that as 'hurt'?
- (A) Yes, because 'any person' can include the person who causes it
- (B) No, because 'whoever causes' implies some other person must be harmed
- (C) Only if another person assisted in causing the pain
- (D) Only if the self-inflicted pain occurs during the commission of another offence
18.A performs an act carelessly, with neither the intention of causing hurt nor the knowledge that he is likely to cause hurt, but hurt results to B. Which statement is correct under Section 115 BNS?
- (A) A has voluntarily caused hurt because hurt in fact resulted
- (B) A is liable under Section 115(2) but with fine only
- (C) A has voluntarily caused hurt if B files a complaint
- (D) A has not voluntarily caused hurt, since Section 115(1) requires intention or knowledge in addition to the causing of hurt
19.Which of the following listed kinds of hurt in Section 116 does not include the word "permanent" and therefore can be grievous without an express permanence qualifier?
- (A) Emasculation
- (B) Permanent privation of the sight of either eye
- (C) Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth
- (D) Permanent disfiguration of the head or face
20.Under Section 117(3) BNS, where the offence causes the victim to be in permanent disability or a persistent vegetative state, the punishment is:
- (A) Rigorous imprisonment of not less than ten years, extendable to imprisonment for life meaning the remainder of that person's natural life
- (B) Simple imprisonment of not less than seven years extendable to fourteen years
- (C) Death or imprisonment for life
- (D) Rigorous imprisonment of not less than five years and fine of ten lakh rupees
21.Which statement correctly describes the relationship between Section 118 and Section 122 as shown in the text of Section 118?
- (A) Section 118 is subject to specified exceptions provided by the corresponding sub-sections of Section 122
- (B) Section 118 applies even where Section 122 provides a case
- (C) Section 122 increases the punishment provided in Section 118
- (D) Section 122 repeals Section 118 entirely
22.Is life imprisonment mandatory upon conviction under Section 119(2) for causing grievous hurt to extort property or constrain an illegal act?
- (A) Yes, Section 119(2) mandates life imprisonment in all such cases
- (B) No, Section 119(2) prescribes either life imprisonment or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, at the court's discretion
- (C) Yes, but only if the extorted property is a valuable security
- (D) No, Section 119(2) prescribes only imprisonment up to ten years
23.If a person voluntarily causes grievous hurt for any purpose referred to in sub‑section (1), the punishment under Section 120 is:
- (A) Imprisonment up to seven years and fine
- (B) Imprisonment for life
- (C) Imprisonment up to three years and fine
- (D) Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and liable to fine
24.X voluntarily causes hurt to public servant A with the intention of deterring another public servant, B, from discharging B's official duty. Under Section 121(1) BNS:
- (A) X is liable, since the section covers intent to deter 'that person or any other public servant' from discharging his duty
- (B) X is not liable, since the hurt and the intended deterrence must relate to the same public servant
- (C) X is liable only under the general provision for voluntarily causing hurt
- (D) X is liable only if B was present at the scene
25.Which mental element must the accused lack to avail Section 122's lesser punishment on provocation?
- (A) He must lack intent to cause hurt to the person who gave the provocation.
- (B) He must neither intend nor know himself to be likely to cause hurt to any person other than the person who gave the provocation.
- (C) He must be unaware that he was provoked.
- (D) He must lack intent only where the hurt is grievous, but not where it is simple hurt.
26.Which of the following scenarios falls squarely within the scope of Section 123?
- (A) Threatening a person but not providing any substance
- (B) Forcing another person to consume an intoxicating drug to facilitate the commission of an offence
- (C) Administering a harmless medicine without any intent to hurt or to facilitate an offence
- (D) Administering a substance but completely unknowingly and without intent or knowledge
27.A person attempts to throw acid on another but is unsuccessful and causes no permanent injury. Under subsection (2), what is the minimum imprisonment for such an attempt?
- (A) Imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than five years.
- (B) Imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than ten years.
- (C) Imprisonment for life.
- (D) No imprisonment; only a fine is imposed for attempt.
28.If the act causes hurt (but not grievous hurt), what is the maximum term of imprisonment under Section 125?
- (A) Three months
- (B) One year
- (C) Three years
- (D) Six months
29.Which of the following situations is protected by the Exception to Section 126 BNS and is therefore NOT wrongful restraint?
- (A) Obstructing a public highway believing traffic rules permit it
- (B) Obstructing a person who the obstructor believes owes him money
- (C) Obstructing a path knowing fully well that one has no right to stop it
- (D) Obstructing a private way over land or water which a person in good faith believes himself to have a lawful right to obstruct
30.What is the basic punishment for wrongful confinement under Section 127(2) BNS?
- (A) Simple imprisonment up to one month, or fine up to five thousand rupees, or both
- (B) Imprisonment up to three years and fine not less than ten thousand rupees
- (C) Imprisonment up to two years in addition to any other term
- (D) Imprisonment of either description up to one year, or fine up to five thousand rupees, or both
31.Which of the following methods are explicitly included in the proviso as ways by which the person may cause the motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion?
- (A) Only by his own bodily power
- (B) By his own bodily power or by disposing a substance only
- (C) By his own bodily power, by disposing any substance so motion takes place without further act, or by inducing an animal
- (D) Only by inducing an animal
32.Which illustration in Section 129 specifically shows 'use of force' produced by disposing substances so that motion is produced without any other person's action?
- (A) A lashes Z’s horses, thereby causing the chariot to quicken its pace.
- (B) A unfastens the moorings of Z’s moored boat, causing it to drift down the stream.
- (C) A seizes the pole of Z’s palanquin and stops it.
- (D) A intentionally pushes against Z in the street.
33.Under Section 130 (Assault) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which of the following best describes an assault?
- (A) Making any gesture or preparation intending or knowing it likely will cause any person present to apprehend that the actor is about to use criminal force
- (B) Any spoken threat, without any accompanying gesture or preparation
- (C) Any physical contact that causes injury
- (D) Preparation to commit an offence when no one is present to observe it
34.Which conduct is specifically punished under Section 131 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
- (A) Assault or use of criminal force otherwise than on grave and sudden provocation
- (B) Causing grievous hurt
- (C) Assault only when grave and sudden provocation exists
- (D) Murder or attempt to murder
35.What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by Section 132 for assaulting or using criminal force against a public servant as provided?
- (A) Imprisonment which may extend to two years
- (B) Imprisonment which may extend to five years
- (C) Imprisonment which may extend to seven years
- (D) Life imprisonment
36.A person assaults a public servant in retaliation for a lawful act previously done or attempted by that public servant. Is this conduct punishable under Section 132?
- (A) Yes, because Section 132 covers assault "in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by such person in the lawful discharge of his duty"
- (B) No, because Section 132 only covers assaults occurring during the performance of duty
- (C) No, unless the assault occurred at the very time of the lawful act
- (D) Yes, but only if the assault prevents the public servant from performing future duties
37.Does Section 133 require actual dishonour to have occurred for punishment to follow?
- (A) Yes — actual dishonour must have occurred as a result of the act
- (B) No — the provision requires the assailant to have intended to dishonour, irrespective of whether dishonour actually occurred
- (C) Yes — either actual dishonour or proof of intention is required
- (D) No — neither intention nor actual dishonour is required; only assault or criminal force suffices
38.If A assaults X while trying to steal a bag that Y is carrying (i.e., the assault is on X but the attempted theft targets Y's carried property), does Section 134 apply to that conduct?
- (A) No — the assaulted person must be the one wearing or carrying the property targeted in the attempt
- (B) Yes — any assault during an attempt to steal another's carried property is covered
- (C) Yes — because the provision covers assault to any person in the course of such attempts, regardless of whose property
- (D) No — only if X was the owner of the property would it apply
39.May a court impose both imprisonment and fine for an offence under Section 135?
- (A) No — only imprisonment is permitted
- (B) Yes — but not both together
- (C) No — only a fine is permitted
- (D) Yes — the court may impose imprisonment, fine, or both
40.Which of the following best follows from the wording of Section 136 regarding the nature of provocation required for its application?
- (A) Both 'grave' and 'sudden' provocation are required for this section to apply
- (B) Only 'grave' provocation is required; suddenness is irrelevant
- (C) Only 'sudden' provocation is required; gravity is irrelevant
- (D) No specific requirement of 'grave' or 'sudden' provocation exists
41.The Explanation to Section 137(1)(b) BNS clarifies that the words 'lawful guardian' include:
- (A) Only the biological parents of the child
- (B) Any person lawfully entrusted with the care or custody of such child or other person
- (C) Any adult relative of the child, whether or not entrusted with custody
- (D) Only a guardian appointed by a court
42.Which of the following correctly distinguishes abduction under Section 138 BNS from kidnapping from lawful guardianship under Section 137(1)(b) BNS?
- (A) Abduction may be committed against any person and requires force or deceit, whereas kidnapping from guardianship concerns a child or person of unsound mind taken without the guardian's consent
- (B) Abduction applies only to minors, while kidnapping applies to adults
- (C) Abduction requires taking the person beyond the limits of India
- (D) Abduction requires the consent of the lawful guardian
43.According to Section 139(3), if a person who is not the lawful guardian employs a child for begging, what legal presumption arises?
- (A) It is conclusively presumed that the person is the child's lawful guardian
- (B) It is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that he kidnapped or otherwise obtained the custody of the child in order that the child might be employed for begging
- (C) There is no presumption; prosecution must prove kidnapping or custody separately
- (D) It is presumed that the child consented to beg
44.A kidnaps Z with the intent to cause Z to be secretly and wrongfully confined. Under Section 140(3) BNS, A is punishable with:
- (A) Imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years
- (B) Imprisonment of either description up to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine
- (C) Death or imprisonment for life
- (D) Imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both
45.Section 141 applies to a girl who is which of the following ages?
- (A) Under the age of eighteen years
- (B) Under the age of twenty-one years
- (C) Under the age of sixteen years
- (D) Under the age of twenty-five years
46.According to Section 142, the punishment for wrongfully concealing or confining a kidnapped or abducted person is:
- (A) A lesser punishment than for kidnapping or abduction.
- (B) Only a fine.
- (C) The same as if he had kidnapped or abducted that person with the same intention, knowledge, or purpose.
- (D) Imprisonment only if the person dies in confinement.
47.What is the minimum sentence prescribed for the offence of trafficking under Section 143(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
- (A) Rigorous imprisonment for not less than three years
- (B) Rigorous imprisonment for not less than five years
- (C) Rigorous imprisonment for not less than seven years
- (D) Rigorous imprisonment for not less than ten years
48.Under Section 144(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, what is the prescribed punishment for whoever, knowingly or having reason to believe that a child has been trafficked, engages such child for sexual exploitation?
- (A) Rigorous imprisonment for not less than five years and which may extend to ten years, and also liable to fine.
- (B) Rigorous imprisonment for not less than three years and which may extend to seven years, and also liable to fine.
- (C) Imprisonment for up to five years and may be fined.
- (D) Only a fine, with no mandatory imprisonment term.
49.Under Section 145 (Habitual dealing in slaves), which of the following activities is expressly criminalized?
- (A) Importing slaves
- (B) Kidnapping a free person for ransom
- (C) Buying stolen property
- (D) Hiring labourers under a contract
50.Which of the following best describes the act prohibited by Section 146 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Unlawful compulsory labour)?
- (A) Compelling any person to labour against that person’s will
- (B) Requiring payment of a debt by force
- (C) Preventing a person from leaving a place
- (D) Refusing to employ a person on discriminatory grounds
Answer key
Explanations
- 1. (A) Section 100 defines culpable homicide as causing death by an act done with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. Mere negligence or any unlawful intention generally is not sufficient.
- 2. (A) Explanation 3 to Section 100 declares that causing the death of a child in the mother's womb is not homicide. However, it may amount to culpable homicide to cause the death of a living child if any part of the child has been brought forth, even though the child may not have breathed or been completely born.
- 3. (B) Clause (b) of Section 101 covers an act done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the particular person harmed. Illustration (b) explains that A, knowing of Z's disease, is guilty of murder, but if A did not know of the disease and the blow would not ordinarily kill a person in sound health, A is not guilty of murder absent intention to cause death or an objectively fatal injury.
- 4. (C) Section 102 expressly provides that if an act intended or known to be likely to cause death of one person causes death of another whom he neither intended nor foresaw, the culpable homicide is of the description it would have been had the intended person's death occurred. Thus the description follows the intended/foreseen victim scenario, not the actual victim.
- 5. (A) Section 103(2) enumerates race, caste or community, sex, place of birth, language, personal belief or any other similar ground. Political affiliation is not expressly listed, though the provision does contain a residuary phrase for similar grounds.
- 6. (D) The provision explicitly defines imprisonment for life in this context: it "shall mean the remainder of that person’s natural life."
- 7. (B) Where the act is done with knowledge that it is likely to cause death but without intention, Section 105 provides imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years and with fine. The higher limb with life imprisonment is reserved for acts done with intention.
- 8. (B) Section 106(2) applies where death is caused by rash and negligent driving not amounting to culpable homicide and the driver escapes without reporting it to a police officer or a Magistrate soon after the incident. The aggravated ten-year punishment turns on the escape without reporting, not on licensing or intoxication.
- 9. (C) Section 107 is specifically confined to suicides committed by "any child, any person of unsound mind, any delirious person or any person in a state of intoxication." It does not, on its face, apply to suicides by persons of sound mind.
- 10. (B) The text of Section 108 makes the offence conditional on a person committing suicide and on the accused having abetted the commission of such suicide. Without the actual commission of suicide, the section is not attracted.
- 11. (B) Section 109(1) provides that the offender shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Life imprisonment or death are only mentioned for circumstances where hurt is caused or under subsection (2).
- 12. (C) The provision states the offender "shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both." The seven-year term applies only if hurt is caused.
- 13. (D) Section 111(2)(a) provides that where organised crime results in the death of any person, the punishment is death or imprisonment for life, along with a fine which shall not be less than ten lakh rupees.
- 14. (A) Section 112(1) defines petty organised crime as acts like theft, snatching, cheating, etc., committed by a person "being a member of a group or gang, either singly or jointly." The provision thus requires group membership but covers acts committed singly or jointly.
- 15. (A) Section 113(1) defines 'terrorist act' as acts done with the intent to threaten unity, integrity, sovereignty, security, or economic security of India or with the intent to strike terror in the people. Other intents such as private gain or mere theft are not the mental states specified in this sub-section.
- 16. (A) Section 114 states that whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt. Therefore the act that matches the provision is causing bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person.
- 17. (A) Section 114 says whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt. The phrase 'any person' is not limited to someone other than the actor, so self-infliction would fall within this wording.
- 18. (D) The definition in Section 115(1) requires the act to be done with the intention of causing hurt or with the knowledge that hurt is likely, and that hurt is thereby caused. Mere causation of hurt without either mental element falls outside 'voluntarily causing hurt'.
- 19. (C) Clauses (b), (c) and (f) explicitly use the word "permanent"; clause (g) states "Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth" without the word "permanent," so fracture or dislocation is listed as grievous without an express permanence qualifier. Emasculation (a) and the "permanent" clauses include permanence by wording or nature but clause (g) alone lacks the term.
- 20. (A) Section 117(3) prescribes rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than ten years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and expressly clarifies that such life imprisonment shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person's natural life.
- 21. (A) Section 118(1) and (2) each begin with 'except in the case provided for by sub-section (1) [or (2)] of section 122', showing that Section 118 is subject to the specific exceptions provided in those corresponding sub-sections of Section 122.
- 22. (B) Section 119(2) provides that whoever voluntarily causes grievous hurt for the purposes in subsection (1) shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Hence life imprisonment is not mandatory; the punishment may be life or a term up to ten years.
- 23. (D) Section 120(2) provides that whoever voluntarily causes grievous hurt for any purpose referred to in sub‑section (1) "shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine."
- 24. (A) Section 121(1) expressly extends to hurt caused with intent to prevent or deter 'that person or any other public servant' from discharging his duty as such public servant. The provision therefore covers hurt to one public servant aimed at deterring another.
- 25. (B) Both sub‑sections require that the accused "neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause [hurt/grievous hurt] to any person other than the person who gave the provocation." The absence of that specific intent/knowledge regarding others is a condition for the lesser punishment.
- 26. (B) Section 123 applies where a person "administers to or causes to be taken by any person any ... intoxicating ... drug" "with intent ... to commit or to facilitate the commission of an offence." Forcing someone to consume such a drug to facilitate an offence falls within the provision.
- 27. (A) Subsection (2) states that whoever attempts to throw or administer acid shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than five years but which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
- 28. (D) Clause (a) provides: 'where hurt is caused, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.' Hence the maximum imprisonment is six months.
- 29. (D) The Exception to Section 126(1) BNS states that the obstruction of a private way over land or water, which a person in good faith believes himself to have a lawful right to obstruct, is not an offence under the section. The Exception is confined to private ways and requires a good faith belief in a lawful right to obstruct.
- 30. (D) Section 127(2) BNS punishes wrongful confinement with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both. The one-month simple imprisonment option is the punishment for wrongful restraint under Section 126(2).
- 31. (C) The proviso lists three ways: (a) by his own bodily power; (b) by disposing any substance so the motion/change/cessation takes place without further act on his or any other person's part; and (c) by inducing any animal to move/change/cease to move. Thus all three are explicitly included.
- 32. (B) Illustration (a) describes A unfastening the moorings and thereby intentionally causing the boat (and Z) to move by disposing substances so motion is produced without any other person's action. The provision treats that as an intentional use of force.
- 33. (A) Section 130 defines assault as making a gesture or preparation intending or knowing it likely will cause a person present to apprehend imminent use of criminal force. Mere words or unobserved preparations without causing apprehension are excluded by the definition.
- 34. (A) Section 131 states: 'Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person otherwise than on grave and sudden provocation... shall be punished...' Therefore the provision targets assault or use of criminal force except where grave and sudden provocation exists. The section does not address grievous hurt or murder.
- 35. (A) Section 132 states the offender "shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both." Thus the maximum term is two years.
- 36. (A) Section 132 expressly punishes assaults committed "in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by such person in the lawful discharge of his duty as such public servant." Therefore retaliatory assaults for lawful acts are covered.
- 37. (B) The provision penalises acts where the person "intending thereby to dishonour that person" assaults or uses criminal force. It therefore focuses on the accused's intention to dishonour, not on whether dishonour in fact resulted, and does not punish mere assault absent that intent.
- 38. (A) The text links the assault/criminal force to "any person" with the theft attempt "on any property which that person is then wearing or carrying." Therefore the person assaulted must be the one wearing or carrying the property targeted; if they are different persons, this section does not apply as written.
- 39. (D) Section 135 provides punishment with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both. This language permits the imposition of imprisonment, a fine, or both together.
- 40. (A) The section expressly refers to "grave and sudden provocation," indicating that both qualities—grave and sudden—are part of the condition for application. Hence both elements are required as per the statutory text.
- 41. (B) The Explanation to Section 137(1)(b) BNS states that 'lawful guardian' includes any person lawfully entrusted with the care or custody of such child or other person. The expression is therefore wider than parents or court-appointed guardians and covers, for example, persons to whom custody has been lawfully entrusted.
- 42. (A) Section 138 BNS applies to 'any person' and hinges on the use of force or deceitful means, with no reference to guardianship or age. Section 137(1)(b) BNS, by contrast, applies only to a child or person of unsound mind taken or enticed out of the keeping of the lawful guardian without the guardian's consent, and needs neither force nor deceit.
- 43. (B) Section 139(3) provides a rebuttable presumption: where a person not being the lawful guardian employs a child for begging, it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that he kidnapped or obtained custody to employ the child for begging.
- 44. (B) Section 140(3) BNS punishes kidnapping or abducting with intent to cause the person to be secretly and wrongfully confined with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years and liability to fine. The ten-year/life term applies to sub-sections (1) and (4), and death only to sub-section (2).
- 45. (B) The text specifically refers to 'any girl under the age of twenty-one years.' Therefore the correct age threshold for a girl is under twenty-one years.
- 46. (C) The provision specifies the offender 'shall be punished in the same manner as if he had kidnapped or abducted such person with the same intention or knowledge, or for the same purpose as that with or for which he conceals or detains such person in confinement.'
- 47. (C) Section 143(2) states that whoever commits the offence of trafficking shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years (and may extend to ten years), and shall also be liable to fine.
- 48. (A) Section 144(1) states the offender shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years, but which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. The provision therefore prescribes a minimum of five years' rigorous imprisonment plus liability to fine.
- 49. (A) The provision lists the acts covered as: "imports, exports, removes, buys, sells, traffics or deals in slaves." Importing slaves is therefore expressly criminalized under Section 145.
- 50. (A) Section 146 criminalises whoever unlawfully compels any person to labour against the will of that person. The provision specifically targets forcible compulsion to labour and not other wrongs such as debt-collection, restraint of movement, or discriminatory hiring.