सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Section 480

When bail may be taken in case of non-bailable offence

Why this exists

This section balances two competing concerns for serious offences: protecting the public and preserving the integrity of the trial process (by restricting bail where there's strong evidence of an especially serious crime, or repeat serious offending) against the presumption of innocence and the real harm caused by prolonged pre-trial detention — hence the many built-in carve-outs for vulnerable persons, delayed trials, and weak prosecution evidence.

How courts read it

The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized the guiding principle 'bail is the rule, jail is the exception' for non-bailable offences, and has held that courts must weigh factors like the nature of the accusation, the strength of the evidence, the risk of tampering or absconding, and the accused's role, rather than mechanically denying bail. Rulings have also stressed that undue delay in trial — the concern directly addressed by this section's 60-day rule — is itself an independent ground for bail.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Bail is essentially impossible to get for any non-bailable offence.
    Fact: Bail is still possible for most non-bailable offences; only specific situations — like strong evidence of a death/life-imprisonment-level crime, or being a repeat serious offender — restrict it, and even then there are built-in exceptions.