सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 96

The Speaker or the Deputy Speaker not to preside while a resolution for his removal from office is under consideration

Why this exists

The framers wanted to prevent an obvious conflict of interest: a Speaker (or Deputy Speaker) should not control the debate on his own removal, since he could misuse the chair's procedural powers to protect himself. At the same time, since he is an elected member of the House and the office is not vacant until removal is actually carried, he retains his basic rights as an MP — to speak, argue his case, and cast an ordinary vote — but is stripped of the special tie-breaking casting vote that comes with presiding.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The Speaker loses all voting rights once a removal motion is moved against him.
    Fact: He can still vote in the first round on the resolution or other matters during those proceedings; he only loses the special casting vote used to break ties.
  • Myth: The Speaker must leave the House entirely during the debate on his removal.
    Fact: He may remain present, speak, and participate — he just cannot preside over that particular sitting.