सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 75

Other provisions as to Ministers

Why this exists

Article 75 lays down the structural rules of India's parliamentary system, borrowed from the British model of cabinet government. It ensures the executive (Council of Ministers) is chosen through the President but is really accountable to the elected Lok Sabha, embodying the principle of responsible government. Clauses 1A and 1B were added later (91st Amendment, 2003) to curb bloated cabinets and prevent defection-driven opportunism from tainting ministerial appointments.

How courts read it

The Supreme Court, notably in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), clarified that the 'pleasure of the President' under clause (2) is not personal discretion but is guided by whether the Council of Ministers retains the confidence of the Lok Sabha, reinforcing collective responsibility under clause (3). Courts have also held that a person who is not a member of either House can still be appointed Minister but must get elected within six months, as per clause (5), tying ministerial legitimacy to democratic representation.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The President can dismiss the Prime Minister or Ministers whenever he personally wishes.
    Fact: Courts have clarified that 'pleasure of the President' under clause (2) is exercised on the advice of the Council of Ministers as long as it enjoys the confidence of the Lok Sabha, not as an independent presidential power.
  • Myth: A Minister must always be a sitting MP at the time of appointment.
    Fact: A person who is not currently an MP can be appointed Minister, but under clause (5) they must become a member of either House within six months or lose the position.