सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 360

Provisions as to financial emergency

Why this exists

The framers of the Constitution, influenced by the economic instability many countries faced (including the Great Depression's aftermath), wanted a safety valve for situations where India's economy or a state's finances were collapsing so badly that normal federal arrangements could not cope. Article 360 was designed as a rarely-used, drastic tool — much like Articles 352 and 356 — to let the Union step in, control spending, and even cut salaries (including of judges) to stabilize the situation, while still requiring parliamentary oversight to prevent misuse.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: A Financial Emergency has been declared in India at some point in history.
    Fact: As of the current knowledge, Article 360 has never been invoked in India since the Constitution came into force.
  • Myth: The President can cut judges' salaries anytime for financial reasons.
    Fact: Salary cuts for Supreme Court and High Court judges under this Article are only possible during a declared Financial Emergency under Article 360(4)(b), not as a general power.
  • Myth: A Financial Emergency automatically continues until the government wants to end it.
    Fact: It must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months, or it automatically lapses, with special rules if the Lok Sabha has been dissolved.