सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 338B

National Commission for Backward Classes

Why this exists

Before 2018, the National Commission for Backward Classes existed only as a body created by an ordinary law (the NCBC Act, 1993), following the Mandal Commission report and the Supreme Court's judgment in Indra Sawhney (1992), which required a permanent mechanism to identify and protect backward classes. To give this body the same strong constitutional standing as the Commissions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Articles 338 and 338A), Parliament passed the Constitution (One Hundred and Second Amendment) Act, 2018, inserting Article 338B. This made the NCBC a constitutional authority with investigative powers, reporting duties to Parliament and State legislatures, and a mandatory consultation role in government policymaking affecting backward classes.

How courts read it

In Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Union of India (2021), the Supreme Court examined the linked Article 342A and held that after the 102nd Amendment, only Parliament (through the President's list) could identify socially and educationally backward classes for a State, stripping States of their earlier power to prepare their own OBC lists — a ruling that caused the Maratha reservation to be struck down. This triggered strong political and federal concerns, leading Parliament to pass the Constitution (One Hundred and Fifth Amendment) Act, 2021, which added clause (3) to Article 342A restoring States' power to maintain their own backward classes lists for State purposes. The proviso to Article 338B(9) reflects this fix, clarifying that such State-list decisions do not require the National Commission's consultation.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The National Commission for Backward Classes decides how much reservation OBCs get in jobs or schools.

    Fact: The Commission investigates, monitors, and recommends — it does not itself set reservation percentages or quotas; that is done through laws and government policy, sometimes reviewed by courts.

  • Myth: States always need this Commission's approval to change their OBC lists.

    Fact: Under the proviso to clause (9), States making or altering their own list of socially and educationally backward classes under Article 342A(3) do not need to consult this Commission.

  • Myth: This Commission is the same as the National Commission for Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes.

    Fact: It is a separate constitutional body (Article 338B) specifically for socially and educationally backward classes, distinct from the SC Commission (Article 338) and ST Commission (Article 338A).