सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 266

Consolidated Funds and public accounts of India and of the States

Why this exists

The framers wanted financial discipline built into the Constitution itself, modeled on the British parliamentary practice of the 'Consolidated Fund'. By pooling government income into one fund and requiring legislative approval (through Appropriation Acts) before spending, the Article ensures the executive cannot spend public money on its own authority — Parliament and State Legislatures control the purse strings, reinforcing democratic accountability over public finance.

How courts read it

Courts have generally treated Article 266(3) as a strict constitutional safeguard: government spending without proper appropriation or beyond sanctioned limits is unconstitutional. Judicial review in cases involving unauthorized expenditure or diversion of public funds has repeatedly emphasized that the Consolidated Fund cannot be touched except through law (typically Appropriation Acts under Articles 114 and 204), reinforcing legislative control over the executive's financial actions.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The government can spend money from the Consolidated Fund whenever it wants for any public purpose.
    Fact: Article 266(3) requires that spending from the Consolidated Fund be authorized by law (usually an Appropriation Act) and only for constitutionally permitted purposes.
  • Myth: All government money is in the Consolidated Fund.
    Fact: Some money, like funds held in trust or deposits, goes into the separate Public Account under Article 266(2), not the Consolidated Fund.