सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 243ZK

Election of members of board

Why this exists

Cooperative societies (like credit unions, farming cooperatives, or dairy cooperatives) often faced problems where elections were delayed or postponed, letting existing boards continue indefinitely or allowing government-appointed administrators to run the society instead of elected members. This undermined democratic control by members. The 97th Constitutional Amendment (2011) added Part IXB, including Article 243ZK, to guarantee timely elections and create an independent election machinery, similar to how Article 243K ensures independent election commissions for panchayats.

How courts read it

The Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Rajendra N. Shah (2021) struck down major parts of the 97th Amendment (including much of Part IXB) for not being ratified by state legislatures as required under Article 368, since cooperative societies are a state subject. However, the Court held that provisions already enacted and applicable to multi-state cooperative societies remained valid. This means the practical application of Article 243ZK varies depending on whether it applies to a state-specific cooperative or a multi-state one.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: This Article applies uniformly to all cooperative societies across India today.
    Fact: After the Supreme Court's 2021 ruling in Rajendra N. Shah, parts of this provision were struck down for state-specific cooperative societies due to a ratification defect in the constitutional amendment; it largely survives only for multi-state cooperative societies.
  • Myth: The central government controls cooperative society elections under this Article.
    Fact: The Article assigns this power to the state legislature, which decides which authority or body will supervise elections and can also make procedural rules.