सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 239

Administration of Union territories

Why this exists

India's Union territories are small, diverse regions (Chandigarh, Andaman & Nicobar, Lakshadweep, etc.) that don't have full statehood. The Constitution's framers gave the central government direct control over them through the President, since many were newly acquired, strategically sensitive, or too small for full-fledged state governments. Article 239 also allows administrative efficiency by letting a neighboring state's Governor double up as administrator, avoiding the need for a separate official for tiny territories like Chandigarh.

How courts read it

Courts have mostly clarified how Article 239 fits with related provisions rather than reinterpreting its core text. In cases involving Delhi (which has the special Article 239AA), the Supreme Court—including in NCT of Delhi v. Union of India (2018)—distinguished ordinary Union territories under Article 239 from Delhi's unique partly-elected structure, holding that Delhi's administrator (Lieutenant Governor) must generally act on the aid and advice of its Council of Ministers, unlike administrators of other Union territories who report directly to the President.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: All Union territories are run exactly the same way, with no differences.
    Fact: Article 239 sets the general default rule, but Parliament can and does create different arrangements for specific territories, like Delhi (Article 239AA) and Puducherry (Article 239A), which have their own legislatures and elected governments.
  • Myth: A Governor acting as a Union territory's administrator must follow the same state Council of Ministers' advice as usual.
    Fact: Article 239(2) specifically says that when a Governor acts as administrator of an adjoining Union territory, he does so independently of his state's Council of Ministers.