सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 202

Annual financial statement

Why this exists

This Article mirrors Article 112 (the Union Budget) but applies it to the states. It ensures that state governments cannot spend public money without the legislature's knowledge and, for most items, its approval — a core principle of parliamentary democracy borrowed from British constitutional practice. Certain expenses (like judges' salaries or debt repayment) are protected from being voted down, so that essential constitutional functions and the state's credit-worthiness are not held hostage to political disputes in the Assembly.

How courts read it

There is little independent judicial elaboration specific to Article 202, since courts generally treat it in parallel with Article 112 (the Union's equivalent provision) and its associated case law on the distinction between 'charged' and 'votable' expenditure, and on the limited scope for courts to interfere in budgetary matters, which are treated as primarily a legislative and executive function.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The state legislature votes on every single item in the state budget.
    Fact: Charged expenditures — like judges' salaries, the Governor's expenses, and debt repayments — are not put to a vote; only the 'other expenditure' portion is voted on.
  • Myth: The Governor personally decides the state budget.
    Fact: The Governor only causes the budget prepared by the state government (Finance Department) to be laid before the legislature; the content is decided by the Council of Ministers.
Article 202 — Annual financial statement · Samvidhan