सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 196

Provisions as to introduction and passing of Bills

Why this exists

States with a bicameral legislature (an Assembly and a Legislative Council) need clear rules on how Bills move between the two Houses, when a Bill counts as validly passed, and what happens to unfinished Bills when a session ends or the Assembly is dissolved. The framers borrowed this structure from British parliamentary practice and the Government of India Act, 1935, adapting it to India's federal and bicameral state systems, while carving out special treatment for Money Bills (which only the Assembly effectively controls, per Articles 198 and 207).

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: A Bill always dies whenever a House session ends.
    Fact: Article 196(3) says a Bill does NOT lapse just because of prorogation (a session ending); it can continue in the next session.
  • Myth: Dissolution of the Assembly kills every pending Bill in the Legislature.
    Fact: A Bill already passed by the Assembly and sitting only in the Council survives dissolution (Article 196(4)); only Bills still pending in or before the Assembly lapse (Article 196(5)).
  • Myth: Both Houses have equal power over all Bills, including Money Bills.
    Fact: Article 196(1) itself notes Money Bills and other financial Bills follow special rules under Articles 198 and 207, where the Legislative Council's role is limited.