सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 159

Oath or affirmation by the Governor

Why this exists

The Constitution's framers wanted every high constitutional officeholder to formally commit to the Constitution before exercising power, creating a moment of public accountability and continuity of constitutional values across changes in government. Requiring the oath before the state's senior judiciary (rather than, say, the legislature) reinforces the Governor's role as a neutral constitutional authority above party politics, and mirrors similar oath requirements for the President and judges elsewhere in the Constitution.

How courts read it

Courts have not extensively litigated Article 159 itself, since it is largely a procedural formality. However, judgments discussing the Governor's office (such as cases on gubernatorial discretion and constitutional propriety) have referenced the oath as underscoring the Governor's duty of impartiality and fidelity to the Constitution, reinforcing that the office is meant to function above partisan politics despite being a political appointment.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The Governor can start working immediately after being appointed by the President.
    Fact: The Governor must first take the oath under Article 159 before a High Court judge; only after this can they legally perform the duties of the office.
  • Myth: The oath must always mention God.
    Fact: The Article allows either swearing 'in the name of God' or making a solemn affirmation without religious reference, giving the Governor a choice.