सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 154

Executive power of State

Why this exists

Article 154 mirrors Article 53 (which vests Union executive power in the President) but applies it to the States. The framers wanted a clear constitutional head for each State's executive branch while leaving room for real administrative power to be exercised by officials and, in practice, by the elected Council of Ministers. This structure follows the British-style parliamentary model adopted for both the Union and the States, where a formal head (President/Governor) holds power in name while an elected government exercises it in substance.

How courts read it

In Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab (1955), the Supreme Court explained that the 'executive power' of the State is a broad, residual power to carry on governance not confined to executing laws already made. Later, in Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974), the Court clarified that although Article 154 vests power in the Governor, he is a constitutional head who, like the President under Article 74, must ordinarily act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, except in specific situations where the Constitution grants him independent discretion.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The Governor can personally run the State government and make decisions on his own.
    Fact: Courts have held that the Governor, like the President, almost always acts on the advice of the elected Council of Ministers, not on his personal judgment, except in a few specific constitutional situations.
  • Myth: Article 154 gives the Governor all administrative powers directly, replacing other authorities named in existing laws.
    Fact: Clause (2)(a) specifically says this Article doesn't take away powers that other laws already give to specific officials or bodies.